It's too bad bill burr has a naive view here of why disasters happen, why wars happen, why malicious people wholly incompatible with humanity accrue power, etc. Someone get this man some theory.
Yep and that's why the evil GDR and USSR still exist, because they brutally used their huge militaries and extensive secret spy networks to kill all those protestors.
Did you read the article posted? even these shit ass liberals admit that state repression against these movements was minimal, except they still have to couch that fact in the same old tired anticommunist lies we've heard for years... "Well no one was really hurt... But they could have been! The government was so scary, and had authority, and was total!"
Alternate title for the glib- Six clowns condemn seventh's circus act. Take a look at the works and ideas these people put forward, and they are really only marginally less serious than trump when it comes to helping the poor or building a welfare net.
Also, these aren't Nobel winners, as in winners of the original categories stipulated by Nobel. Instead they were awarded the Nobel Memorial prize in economics, which was started by the Swedish Central Bank in 1968. It's purpose was to redirect popular and academic attention back towards liberal theories, instead of towards alternatives (ie.Marxists), by way of providing a fake academic gloss and placing economists like Friedman and Hayek on the same level of import as Einstein or Martin Luther King.
He and Guglielmo Carchedi wrote a book called Capitalism in the 21st Century: Through the Prism of Value. I'm about halfway through definitely worth reading imo. It's more of a general view of capitalism but it reads similar to his blogs.
Does contemporary Marxism still consider feudalism to be a unified mode of production? I've heard some historians say that there was never such a thing as indivisble feudalism, rather that there were different modes sort of interacting during this time which taken as a whole compose our conception and stereotypes of what feudalism means.
Could China during that time be considered feudal, or is it specifically a western European thing?
It's too bad bill burr has a naive view here of why disasters happen, why wars happen, why malicious people wholly incompatible with humanity accrue power, etc. Someone get this man some theory.