I worked in preclinical drug development and then another was marketing for child care. It was kind of the norm for everything, not just crisis.
I worked in preclinical drug development and then another was marketing for child care. It was kind of the norm for everything, not just crisis.
I think that’s to keep you occupied to force you to listen to the shitty voiceover that you’d normally skip. Or I guess the opposite?
Racing through my CCTV!
Haha! True, true. It’s the internet though. If someone posts something, it will most assuredly be argued by someone else. Is there a rule for this? I feel like there should be a rule for this.
No one knows it. Someone made a comment and now people are arguing over whether or not someone would push a button over another.
If presented both emojis, I would’ve chosen shrugged over laugh because I honestly don’t care.
I was just setting the record straight about definitions because Felix said shrugging is not apathy when it actually is via a definition of “a state of indifference or lack of interest, emotion, or concern about something.”
I’d argue that shrugging is definitely apathy based on the definition of the word. Laughing in a mocking matter is lack, or rejection, of empathy.
In either case, whatever.
That’s actually how it’s supposed to work. You don’t talk and you refer question askers to PR, HR, and lawyers. I’ve always been instructed this for any organization I worked for.
The original is deny, defend, depose which is about what insurance agencies do.
This one is defy, defend, dispose which is about revolution. First and last words are different to convey a different meaning.
I’m not familiar with the University of Michigan but
The regents cite a need to reassess DEI efforts, emphasizing “diversity of thought.”
Assuming it’s probably more liberal minded then this means more Republican thoughts/views?
I had to look up who this was and found this. Thought it was interesting.
They mean humans - so speciest
Oh they could and the old people there would suddenly be on Florida’s ass about this stupid law and get it changed very very quickly.
Didn’t German u-boats get sunk by their crew rather than allow that tech to get into the hands of the Allied powers?
I would think self destruct is the same concept.
My guess is timeframe vs active interactions of posts. Like a short term popularity metric? Lemmy has it as a sort option.
Yeah, that makes sense.
I think I came to a realization that you were answering based on pinging and monitoring speeds for a test. My mind was thinking about someone leaving that option turned off after the tests and what they would do with increased speeds (e.g., change their demand).
Sorry for the confusion.
Oh, I think I know the issue now! The answer was about pinging and getting accurate speed counts. I’m thinking about what happens after when someone leaves that setting off.
Sorry, my mind was working on a different scenario using the same solution.
Well, speeding data up would mean you get to caps quicker. Reaching a data cap in half a month vs a month can be a big deal for some people.
Regarding issue 3 - in America there are data caps and couldn’t this potentially push someone to hit those caps or have the ISP enforce data caps because you’re now a “power user”?
Additionally, does any of option 3 bind your firewall some and reduce your protection?
Sorry for questions, I am trying to learn/understand stuff this.
Close down stores is my guess.
Except Dolly’s song isn’t brain rot.