Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
51
Joined
3 yr. ago

| Pronouns | She/Her |

  • No, that's different. Big country invaded little country to defend little country.

  • I REALLY hope something comes of this. But at the same time, I'm not sure if I would buy one myself. Compatibility with x86 is massively important to me, and I can't really divorce myself of it outside of portables. I just have too much investment in legacy software. Mostly video games to be fair. Which might be part of the reason for the push to RISC-V.

  • Holy hell, isn't that the new one about the Federation CIA that's universally hated?

  • Strange New Worlds explicitly states that it's socialist. Liberals like to pretend there's a difference, but I honestly don't know what socialism means without communism being involved.

  • I've been on xiao Hong Shu. That's exactly what happened. I was devastated.

  • I saw that earlier and was going to post it here when I got back to my computer. Absolutely depressing. But if the comments at Phoronix were anything to go by, this isn't going over well. Hopefully sanity will prevail.

  • Stalin: Let's feed the hungry people!

    Lib: Why are you supporting this asshole?

  • See my edit. But here's the thing. We have video of the moon landing and rocks from the actual moon. That's solid evidence. We have plenty of evidence of the atom existing, because half our tech wouldn't work if they didn't exist.

    Where is the evidence of a massacre at tiananmen square? Please read the links I gave you.

    Edit: please remember, you said that this was an easily disprovable conspiracy theory.

  • To deny the events that unfolded at Tiananmen Square is like denying that humans have been to the moon. It’s an unfounded, in fact, disprovable conspiracy theory.

    So prove it to us then. All you're doing right now is scolding us for being insane conspiracy theorists. I've never seen any evidence that anything happened at tiananmen square. Reports from people who were actually there all say that there was no massacre

    The US has a very long history of lying about its enemies. There are plenty of declassified CIA docs that talk about what lies to tell the media. Why is this one different?

    Edit: also, see pen names. Isn't it a little hypocritical to call us conspiracy theorists when you come to the conclusion that the book was lies written by China or North Korea because you can't find any information about the author?