But you called out a direct quote taken from wikipedia as AI bullshit - you did exactly the thing I just described. Also, show me where I admitted something? You neglected that in your reply just now. It's pretty important.
Just... look we can all see that you misidentified a legitimate quote as having been written by an AI, attacked me over it (sure fair enough, AI slop shouldn't be here, just you know... make sure it is slop before you pull the trigger), and now it's spiraling. It happens, people make mistakes. Just take the L and move on.
Lunch atop a Skyscraper is a black-and-white photograph taken on September 20, 1932, of eleven ironworkers sitting on a steel beam of the RCA Building, 850 feet (260 meters) above the ground during the construction of Rockefeller Center in Manhattan, New York City. It was a staged photograph arranged as a publicity stunt, part of a campaign promoting the skyscraper.
Sadly the original image was just capitalist propaganda. Impressive yes, but an entirely manufactured celebration of the worker for cynical advertising reasons.
Yeah, I know you don't. I'll freely admit it was kinda self-indulgent to try and explain such a basic aspect of debate, and I was just happily dunking on you under the assumption it'd go over your head and you'd play off the superiority complex to try to save some face.
I notice you haven't replied to the other commenter which laid out in much clearer terms what I'm saying here, and goes into more details about why you're full o' crap - if you're so interested in an "adult conversation" why haven't you just gone to engage with them instead?
Dude I addressed the blatantly false premise your points were based on instead of the points themselves, because addressing them individually would imply a tacit acceptance of the faulty assertions they're founded upon.
Sherlock keeping a receipt could... have given me a clue?
what???