In a ideal situation this sort of failsafe wouldn't be needed - but your line is "The power can lay in the hands of the people who put that person into power". What if, just suppose, the people putting that person into power aren't the proletariat? A totally wild hypothetical here I know, when would something like THAT ever happen. But those people, by your hypothetical would then be the ones with the power to go “hang on this guy is no longer doing a good job leading things, let’s replace him”.
Those aren't answers to my question - but sure, I'll answer yours: term limits are a safeguard against one person consolidating power. Having them ensures that there will be political structures subordinate to them that survive a transfer of power, and thus said power can't be singly consolidated.
Distribution of power is a very basic concept of communism, I think you just don't know what you're talking about.
While I like the sentiment, Ho Chi Minh very intentionally styled his english after speeches given by americans like Regan (genius propaganda move), which is why his quotes sound so much more plausible as legitimate regan lines. Mao wasn't eloquent in nearly the same way, which is a big part of why those so clearly aren't regan quotes. It just doesn't sound like him.
Because exceptionalism is a poison regardless of your political philosophy - other people can do an equally good job. Why is it necessary for power to be held by a singular person for so long?
We're not the target audience here, this is a message to putin that they're sick enough of his shit to explicitly call out his strategy. It's part of a gradual escalation.
I finally got a chance to read it and while it sounds similar, the above linked is a "true" 3D architecture - that being a monolithic piece manufactured as one unit, and with spectacularly higher vertical connection density than you get in HBM (which is basically a stack of 2D dies with bus connections between layers(oversimplifying)). The team is also working to get vertical oriented logic (!!) as a standard feature with this architecture, which just isn't possible with HBM. There's a lot of design aspects taken from HBM assembly it seems, but this is just a very different beast.
Well sure, it's way easier to feel superior to someone else than it is to deal with the fascist groups slowly taking over their own governments.
But in my experience people don't really sneer at the US except in meaningless online dickwaving contests - right now most people are either embarrassed on our behalf or terrified of what shit we'll pull next. Usually, both.
Oh man, if this pans out this is huge. Like, next-level evolutions in both density and computing power. Lots of development work before its widespread if it is legit, but for a while it was looking like this was effectively impossible for the sub 30 processes so this is so kickass to see.
Cross and Erlich also found that Miko’s parental controls are severely lacking. Many of the controls are also paywalled behind an expensive $15 monthly subscription.
Man, the real worst part is going to be giving your kid an artificial "friend" then having to explain what happened once their "friend" loses support and gets shut down by the company next year. This is already going to socially isolate them, then you're just gonna digitally fridge mr. bear? jfc...
Oh to be clear I think it's pretty creepy - I'm just never going to argue you shouldn't be allowed to post it. Emphatically not my thing, but not everything is and that's fine.
Genuinely glad you have had it confirmed that at least one subject is comfortable with it. Not judging I swear: is consent of the subject something you seek out before writing the fics or is it just, like a bonus?
In a ideal situation this sort of failsafe wouldn't be needed - but your line is "The power can lay in the hands of the people who put that person into power". What if, just suppose, the people putting that person into power aren't the proletariat? A totally wild hypothetical here I know, when would something like THAT ever happen. But those people, by your hypothetical would then be the ones with the power to go “hang on this guy is no longer doing a good job leading things, let’s replace him”.