Staring straight into @AlarminglyBad@mstdn.social comics’ Galbor month.

That makes sense!

That sounds like exactly what I meant; where the GPL is viral on the project level, MPL is viral on the file level. So if code, under MPL, is added to a file, that whole code becomes MPL.

AFAIK MPL is viral, but only at the file level. In other words, if you modify an MPL-licensed file, your modifications need to be MPL-licensed, but if you add additional files, those can be a different license.

(In practice, I suppose that that’s fairly weak?)

Wait a minute, what is the Flatpak Nvidia package? Do you need that for GPU acceleration for Flatpak apps on Nvidia? How do you even know whether GPU acceleration is working?

(I recently got a new laptop and it’s the first time I have a dedicated GPU, and I have no idea how it all works. Sorry for hijacking your thread.)

Ah yes, so many classic songs in the genre! There’s 🇩🇪️ Scooter, 🇧🇪️ K3, 🇳🇱️ De jeugd van tegenwoordig, 🇫🇷️ Poisson Steve…

That would’ve been awesome if Lemmy had done that automatically, for lazy folks like me 😅️

Oh sorry, I was hoping Lemmy would just bring up a profile page. Theoretically that should be possible and would actually be an awesome Fediverse feature, but reality is a bitch 😅

Oh that’s a shame to hear.

“The government should prevent people from seeing this” is promoting censorship. Suggesting people ignore something is just a boycott.

I don’t have a Linux phone myself, but from all I’ve read the Furilabs FLX1s is the most “Just works” Linux phone today that runs a community UI (Phosh+GNOME). Supposedly it runs Android apps well, and regular Flatpaks.

I think Jolla has a more custom software stack, but it also supposedly works well.

See also @linmob@linuxmobile.social.

Oh sorry, that might have been projecting - it’s what I want to believe.

That’s true. If they’re not, though, or if they’re easy to generate yourself, then you are kinda forced to pay attention though, if you care about the security of your project.

I don’t have the expertise or experience to say whether that is true. But GregKH seems to think so, and other prolific projects seem to be coming to the same conclusions.

I get that it’s attractive to think that AI isn’t capable of it. But it’s important that what you believe to be true is, and stays, based on reality rather than on what I wish is true. And it’s especially important to be wary of when you really want something to be true.

If these tools are indeed finding security issues, then ignoring them means someone else will find those issues - and abuse them.

Just toggle “Block AI enhancements” in the Firefox settings - way easier than a plugin, and safer too (not potentially dodgy third party).

The one vote was just an amendment, the actual extension was rejected by a clear majority.

Are you implying that the “generate key points” thingy is not privacy-respecting? If so, in what way is it not?

It’s not so much that they’re blocking it, as it is that they’re not implementing it. In GNOME, as I understand it, the Emoji picker is implemented by the toolkit (GTK). That means that apps that don’t (fully) use that toolkit, such as Chrome and Firefox, will need to add the implementation themselves. That is now done for Firefox.

Yes, but that didn’t work in Firefox before this change. The whole point of this change is to make that work in Firefox as well. (Likewise, it still doesn’t work in Chrome, Chrome-based browsers, and Electron apps.)

So the situation in which this makes sense is when you’re using Gnome.