Sure, but this article is about the lack of utility-scale solar capacity (read: large solar plants), not small-scale, individual efforts.

That seems to be the same conclusion that MB Hydro has reached, as well.

I’m a little surprised that there hasn’t (as far as I know) been any talk about arming the coast guard - the way things are headed, it seems a little inevitable.

Claiming Canada was founded on the principle of strong provinces, Ms. Smith said, “Canada is very different from the United States and many other Western democracies. For example, the U.S. centralizes the majority of power and decision-making in its federal government. In Canada, we chose a decentralized federation composed of very unique and diverse provinces left to govern themselves in almost all matters with the main exceptions of national defence and international affairs.”

Absolutely unhinged.

That wasn’t my take - collectibility is a pretty core component of CCGs, but that can be accomplished easily with basic probability tables, without any blockchain bullshit.

My biggest concern is what they’re going to do to monetize it - this sort of game is pretty prone to exploitation.

Something like the Marvel Snap model could be pretty good, though.

I’ve heard nothing but good things, and should really catch up.

I did a bit of a double-take here:

The Swiss-made, turbo-prop CT-157 Siskin II has been chosen to replace the Snowbird squadron. The planes are already on order and are being delivered for use as the air force’s initial pilot training aircraft.

Sure enough, these are not jet aircraft.

I think it’s perfectly understandable to at least attempt to rein in an increasingly rogue province by making a mutually acceptable deal. I don’t believe it will help, or at least not much, but I can understand the attempt.

The lesson is obvious to provinces: dont follow federal laws you dont agree with.

That said, I can’t really disagree with this point.

Ultimately, the proposed pipeline still seems to be contingent on finding a private entity that thinks it’s a good investment, and I’m not at all convinced that that will ever happen. We’ll see.

The counterpoint (and it’s a deeply shitty, cynical counterpoint) is that the original targets weren’t realistic to begin with, and would have been missed, just like every other climate target ever.

Is this better? History suggests it probably isn’t. Is it worse? Maybe, but the depressing truth is it might just be a lateral move.

And that’s the strongest “defense” I’m able to muster, which is pretty depressing.

There’s a lot of good context in here, even as I’m still deeply conflicted about this strategy.

“The final Canada-Alberta MOU implementation agreement will put Canada’s target of net zero by 2050 well out of reach,” Rick Smith, president of the Canadian Climate Institute, said in a written statement.

The Pembina Institute said its modelling showed the carbon pricing schedule included in the implementation agreement would result in an additional 230 megatonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over the next 15 years.

The federal government had no modelling of its own to offer on Friday.

The policy left behind by Justin Trudeau’s government was stronger on paper. But Carney might argue his policy is stronger in practice — not least because it was achieved via political consensus with a conservative Alberta premier.

…

In defiance of the federal benchmark, Smith’s government had frozen the province’s industrial price at $95 per tonne last year. (Meanwhile, Saskatchewan has stopped collecting an industrial carbon price altogether.) And because of inefficiencies in Alberta’s pricing system, the effective price was much lower.

A private backer was a requirement in the original MoU, and I can’t tell from the article whether that’s still the case.

If so, the whole thing may well be a non-starter.

In the short term, I think Carney is prioritizing “re-industrializing” the country over certain environmental protections.

I certainly have hope that the worst effects will be mitigated by things like what you’re describing, but…I’m just not sure.

I tend to think that most deadlines will be missed, and most budgets will be overrun…the only question is degree.

I’m probably projecting, but I hope people realize that Trudeau did at much as he could without reopening the Constitution, which is a non-starter.

I have a feeling it’s neither enough for the reformists, nor enough for the abolitionists, so it’s just kind of ignored.

It’s one of those things that’s simultaneously pretty important and not important at all. Their role in Parliament is ceremonial, but they’re still something of a dignitary.

Fun!

Star Trek IV is a bit of a left-field choice, but I’m not mad about it.

The judge’s statements are appropriately scathing.

Justice Conlan said he commends the work of the defence and the Crown in this case.

He said it is not the defence’s fault “the evidence of their clients has been found to be worthless.”

All in all, he said, the Crown proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt on every count.

He said electronic evidence “points overwhelmingly to the guilt of the accused.”

He wrote they “paint a picture of loathe and hate by both accused towards the boys, especially towards L.”

The judge said a Dec. 28, 2020, audio recording played in court of the women berating L.L. was “so difficult to listen to,” and “is just a terrible and shocking exhibit of abuse of L. by these accused.”

He said a Sept. 24, 2021, video the court viewed of L.L. using a small portable toilet to relieve himself was “excruciating to watch.”

“This court could go on and on, but for what purpose other than to, in a way, continue to victimize L. He should be remembered for more than this.”

I’m sure there’s a pitch to studios that could work, but

That’s pretty much where I’m at. Is it something I think I desperately need? Not by a long shot.

Could they do something interesting with it? Sure, I guess.

They announced the show would be ending, but gave it another season. That’s the opposite of a sunk cost, but thanks for showing your whole ass.