Skip Navigation

Posts
26
Comments
494
Joined
2 yr. ago

map (\s -> 'h':s) ["e",'i':"m"]

Gamer™

I have commited the Num-Code for ™ to muscle memory.

Other interests include bicycles, bread making and DIY. I do own a 3D-printer and adore the Nintendo 3ds.

  • 87 billion eurosThe deficit in value of exports versus imports will surpass 2022's previous record of just over 84 billion euros, said GTAI.

    At this point I wonder if Inflation is done not to promote investments, but to help journalists so every year a "record number" of something happens in business they can report on.

    Anyway, have we tried selling them Opium? Worked for England once I heard.

  • For once, a sign could do with more quotation marks.

  • Kann ja existieren und eine eigene Definition haben, dagegen will ich ja nichts gesagt haben.

    Ich weiss nur nicht, warum das im Gegensatz zu introvertiert oder extrovertiert stehen soll. Der Artikel impliziert ja 3 Kategorien: "Introvertiert ODER Extrovertiert ODER Otrovertiert", ich bin der Meinung, so wie das beschrieben ist, geht ja eher 4 Kategorien: "(Introvertier und Otrovertiert) ODER (Introvertiert und nicht Otrovertiert) ODER (Extrovertiert und Otrovertiert) ODER (Extrovertiert und nicht Otrovertiert)".

    Fehlendes Gruppengefühl mag man eher zu einer Seite des Spektrums zuordnen, aber steht ja nicht im Gegensatz zu, vereinfacht, "viele schwächere Kontakte -" oder "wenige starke Kontakte" pflegen.

  • "Dritter" Persönlichkeitstyp

    Ignorieren wir einmal, dass Persönlichkeitstheorie schon längst weiterentwickelt wurde, und "introvertiert" und "extrovertiert" nicht als 2 Schubladen, sondern heute häufig als ein weiteres Spektrum gesehen werden. Das bedeutet es ist normal, sich in verschiedenen Situationen anders einzuordnen, oder auch sich irgendwo dazwischen zu sehen. Das wurde schon als "ambivertiert" bezeichnet, was wohl am ehesten den Titel verdient.

    Und selbst dann: Ich sehe nicht, wieso das ein eigener Typus sein soll, der im Gegensatz zu den anderen beiden steht. Kann doch genauso gut "introvertiert & otrovertiert" sein was die Leute in den Beispielen des Artikels beschreibt.

  • *in Minecraft

  • Neighbourhood is dying, new or expecting parents do not move here any more. And old folks get really aggressive when you dare go around as a young teen, for some reason.

  • Macht's wie Ich und schreibt ausschließlich Social Media Posts und Online Manifeste. Bloß nicht irgendwas, was Mehrkosten erzeugt. Irgendwann müssen die Verantwortlichen ja kleinbei geben.

    Machen wir in der Gewerkschaft übrigen auch so, wehe jemand fordert einen Streik an, es wissen doch schon alle, dass wir mehr Geld haben wollen.

  • Locked

    Pow--

    Jump
  • What do you mean "what"? I don't think I could have been any clearer.

    And if you meant to reply to the other comment, they meant to write horseshoe theory.

  • Sorry, that part was not meant to imply you specifically want to reduce safety standards, just that if you want to have it be competitive on the energy market, you would have to do something about that, or subsidise it by an absurd amount.

    But the point still stands, nuclear energy is expensive, and it's not because of subsidies to other energy sources. Please don't claim so next time.

  • I'm pretty sure it's not subsidies, but safety standards. I'm not trying to pretend to understand Lazards "levelized cost of electricity", and their graphs are seem to be off by 20 or I don't read them correctly, but they are at least very clear that subsidies are taken out when they make their comparison. Nuclear is still the most expensive no matter how you slice it (except rooftop residential solar, but I think that gets around paying energy providers or something). Anyway, I'm more willing to trust them than the world nuclear association on if nuclear is price competitive.

    I'll grant you a better argument for next time: Nuclear is incredibly safe compared to other energy sources, but is uniquely held to a way higher safety standard than anything else. And reducing the cost of nuclear by reducing safety standards actually is unpopular, so politicians don't do it and the cost keeps rising.

    I'd still disagree on loosening safety restrictions, but at least that would be true, instead of blaming subsidies.

  • This meme was translated from mentalese.

  • Locked

    Pow--

    Jump
  • Don't claim some races are inferior to others, you are only encouraging them.

  • Are there not better means of renewable energy generation

    Well, if you're going to claim that, I'll have you know that in our infinite wisdom to create an energy market, energy needs to be cheap to produce as well.

    No current nuclear power plant where I live (cost seems to be rather location dependant) is creating cheap energy, they're always more expensive than renewables. That's why the investments in them has increased so much over the last few years while nuclear is just trudging along in the race to replace fossil fuels.

  • Ghost Trick's entire second half is filled with them, but you cannot describe them spoiler-free... "When he looks at you" is the best I can come up with.

    Return of the Obra Dinn, when you first look up in Abigail's death scene.

  • Because it's hens and cows that are farmed for their products, veganism is a feminist issue.

    Feminism is notoriously concerned with chromosomes rather than personhood. /s

  • Tja, Sprache verändert sich. In meiner Grundschulzeit hießen die auch noch nicht Schokoküsse und niemand, den ich kannte hatte sich am Originalbegriff gestört.

    Es gibt genug Gründe, das Geschlechtsneutral zu formulieren, eben weil "Die in dieser Satzung genannten Personenbezeichnungen umfassen alle geschlechtlichen Formen" nicht ausreicht.

  • Interesting what's written here, I actually saw it more often in some Discord server. As far as I know, there it is just for fun and/or homestuck nostalgia, without any deeper meaning behind it.

    Just like calling X "twitter" or "the hellsite", or annotating everything with parenthesis, or using or refusing to use emoji, there does not need to be more of a reason to do something with written language than "I like it that way". How much stylisation you can inject into your writing before you stop being comprehensible is another question.

  • Ah, so it was just a big PR stunt then. I will not look into this further until the news confirm my findings.

  • There is a time and place for everything, and this ain't it.