Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T
Posts
0
Comments
191
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Had it only been Sweden, as before the eu-directive changed the order of things, the grid would have been more sufficient.

    There are no lack of issues in the Swedish grid, but they are compounded by the fact that right now it tries to solve the problem of insufficient grid infrastructure in Norway, Finland and lack of power production and electricity areas in Germany. Last year when the oil power plant had to be fired for 3 days, it was because of insufficiencoes in the polish network...

    In fact, by the look of it, the Swedish grid is the only grid in the area that actually works as it says on the can.

  • So you want Sweden to suboptimize it's energy grid so that Germany doesn't have to take responsibility for their own electricity needs? It's not the solution to this problem.

    And, as others are saying: there are other projects in the north of Sweden aiming to use that energy.

  • Aye, I agree. And given the fit-for-55 directive, that push will continue, further reducing the economic viability of nuclear. Nuclear is dead.

    However, regardless of the state of nuclear in Europe, the big problem is that Germany does not produce enough energy, which spikes the energy prices in neighbouring countries. Here, electricity suddenly becomes 8 times more costly when Germany imports electricity. That is something Germany needs to address or face constant demands of building nuclear.

  • Well, to be frank, Sweden is Europes second largest, or largest depending on the state of things in France, electricity exporter in Europe. Sweden do not necessarily need more large scale electricity production. Specially not given the drive towards micro production that is now ongoing.

    The only reason to build large scale is to accommodate AI or some other extremely energy dependant technology. They can happily build and run their own electricity network and not include the ordinary consumers, nor the taxpayers.

    This time, it seems, they found the golden nugget despite being blind.

  • Ugh... I got to try those buttons the other day. Might work in an intersection. Horrible in a roundabout!!! No wonder nobody use them!

  • It's because BMW doesn't top up the indicator fluid as standard during service.

  • Yeah, because "dump-it-and-forgett-it" hasn't come back to haunt us in the past? We've got everything from toxic waste to old ammo and nuclear waste that are ticking time bombs we don't know how to handle as is. But sure! Let's add another one to the list!

  • The oceans are enormous, but so is the rest of the world. Didn't stop us from affecting most of it. As you say, the ocean may be big enough to handle some, but we can't afford to dump it all in the ocean. The waste will not build up to a hill, it will in a very short time build up to a mountain.

  • Inert in human time scales at least. What I'm getting at, is the sheer volume we have to deal with and that in and of itself is a problem.

    If we are pumping up 100 million barrels of oil per day, Thats 16 000 million liters, or 16 million cubic meters. An ordinary house in these parts is about 40 cubic meters. So, 400 000 houses per day is added to the problem and the scale of what needs to be taken care of.

    If we were to dump 400 000 houses worth of sand or other inert material onto any single plot of the seabed that part of seabed is dead. There are no two ways about it.

  • I don't know wether to cry or laugh. Take one problem and substitute for another. There is the small problem of space, as in volume and we are back to the 1950-idea of dumping millions of tons of trash onto the sea floor. But hey, at least we didn't die by cooking.

  • Sure, better range is always nice, if that's the case, but I didn't drive it enough to be able to come to that conclusion. The power usage from previous owners was as expected, though.

  • The problem I have with id7 is that it is bigger on the outside, smaller on the inside and not as fun to drive. Having said that, I recently got to drive a new Model3 and the changes the last 5 years has not done it any favours. Quieter, yes, but that's about it for the positives.

  • State level isn't where it's at. And not climate change either. This is now a question of business continuity. How will your local government function if suddenly there is no oil, be it import blockade or lack of demand? Or if the bad neighbour invades your country?

    Decarbonation isn't a goal in and of itself at this point, but being able to run the local government for months on end with disrupted energy delivery is a goal. And that goal demands local energy production and local energy storage. Sun, wind and wood are the best sources for local energy in the winter. Add a battery pack to squeeze out those last sun rays to keep going a wee bit longer after sundown.

    Sure, a diesel engine is the quick fix, but it requires refuelling every other day and even a small restriction, like a strategic mine field, will hamper delivery badly enough to potentially cause a crisis.

  • Me neither, I'm talking economics. Can't do business if there is none.

  • Well, it won't take much to disrupt big oil. I understand that they are trying. Norway is lost, most of Europe is leaning away and oil prices are going down. Just a little bit more and production outside OPEC wount be profitable any longer...

  • And that's the problem we need renewables to solve. As long as the price can be pushed skywards as soon as there is no wind, reactors will unfortunately have to be brought offline for emergency maintenance or somesuch.

    But the solution we need isn't as limited as regular batteries, regardless of chemistry. We need more. Much more. And that's the challenge. If we can't store electricity, we need to store something that easily can be turned into electricity or, worsr case, store it as something that can reduce the need of electricity.

  • Thanks. At first i read Danish, but that wasn't easier to understand, colorwise.

  • I wonder, is this the throwes of a dying oil industry? Delaying the inevitable. Delay.

    What happens to the oil infrastructure in a country where 95% of all new cars are EV? How long will the gas infrastructure uphold? How many companies in heavy transport can afford to uphold their own refuelling infrastructure for long hauls? Farmers have it a wee bit easier, they always start and end their day at the farm. Yet, the one (green) hydrogen plant I've visited was at a farmer already doing agrivoltaics.

    The fall of oil as fuel can be abrupt.

    What happens to oil demand if whole countries suddenly stops buying oil? 2022 it was estimated that the cost of producing a barrel of oil outside OPEC was just below 50$. Today oil is traded at 70$. Slim margins, to say the least. What happens if the price drops further?

    The fall of oil as fuel can be abrupt, indeed.

    We need to prepare ourselves for a life without oil and we need to start today. And at grass root level. Politicians seems to have lost the plot.