Skip Navigation

TʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾

@ TherapyGary @lemmy.blahaj.zone

Posts
97
Comments
1250
Joined
1 yr. ago

Being a bodyless head with a freak long tongue is not only okay—it can be an exciting opportunity

  • Your reasoning is bad- I was just trying to point it out gently without being too explicit about calling you out for the arrogant moron you are.

  • Lots of hella smart people have made this topic their entire life for literally thousands of years, and the debates are still ongoing. An individual's observations mean little

  • Your comment does the same thing you're critiquing OOP for doing. What gives you the authority to claim as fact that there exists no objective morality?

    Edit: tbc, I also don't believe in object morality, but what I have issue with is the apparent contradiction you've made

  • Movie magic means you can get away with it by adding a little "Not legal tender; for motion picture use only" on there, but I do like your idea

  • Do you think they've bothered to trademark it? Could get some coins custom printed like this and beat them to market

  • I'm currently crowd funded, but I've been thinking about seeing if Blue Cross Blue Shield wants to fund me

  • Oh yes

    Jump
  • It's just an objectively true statement. Engaging in a thing legitimizes it.

  • Engaging in electoralism legitimizes involuntary government

  • Lol are you paying attention

  • Idk that's definitely a spectrum. E.g., abolishing prisons, police, ICE, etc increases freedom

  • Lmao, is this meant to be dunking on people who memed the kirk killing?

  • whoever happens to be in the house at the moment

    I know that this is probably about roommates or family members, but I like to imagine you leave your door open and yell these sorts of questions at whoever might wander in

  • Fantastic, thanks!

  • I'm trying to find a word that I can use in contexts like, e.g., "As an anarchist, I don't agree with ____s." I can't do that with socialists and communists because I do jive with libertarian socialists and anarcho-communists. I suppose the only safe option is to just be specific and say Marxists/Maoists/etc, but I was hoping there'd be a word to describe the "archist" component of these ideologies that I don't vibe with without having to get so specific.

    Can we just steal "archists" back? Lol (From Marsden, I mean)

  • Yeah, I'm familiar with this argument, I just don't agree with the way you're using the word (and tbh I don't think it's worth arguing over- I just want a better word to use to avoid having to avoid this argument)

  • Idk I feel like that's not the kind of distinction I'm looking for, because I like anarcho-communism


    Edit:

    Re: @m532@lemmygrad.ml

    If anarcho-communism isn’t communism, why is “communism” in its name?

    What? I didn't say it's not communism, I'm saying that calling y'all communists isn't necessarily a distinction from anarchists, bc there's an anarchist version of communism.