Is only genocide if ICC OK…

DNC staff: if you’re reading this - this is a joke. We do not in fact want Hillary Clinton to run. Please. No.

4 fears later: Oh ffs…

Would like to see the data distribution by geography

Marvelous Miss Maisle is solid from om beginning to end. Not a minute, scene or note is wasted. The writers know how to pack every scene with as much energy and storytelling as possible. Just perfect.

Thank you for sharing your experience. This clears up quite a bit for me and I’m a bit surprised with myself it wasn’t obvious sooner. I think I’m just fascinated by societal norms about gender presentation and how it evolves over time. What you explained makes total sense to me.

Thank you!

It’s real. Just because tech bros and magats align sometimes there is still a discrepancy between the two. At the end of the day, the Maga tech bros are just higher up the ladder from the general Maga folks. In other words: there’s always bigger fish.

This is an interesting article but it’s a little superficial. I wish it addressed where that internal gender originates from. It’s something I’ve been trying to understand. We know gender dysphoria is real and transgender is something that needs to be addressed through presentation (I hope I’m saying this right). But doesn’t that presentation ultimately conform to arbitrary societal norms on gender presentation?

Globalism for me but not for thee

It’s impressive how much of an opinion on a topic people can have despite not knowing jack shit. But for some reason the onus is always on the rest of us to hold your hand. And if we get into the specifics of something suddenly we’re ‘contrarian’.

Israel is committing genocide for sure but don’t kid yourself in the narrative that hamas is some noble liberation army. It’s clear you’re not equipped to talk about any of this.

Notice how you can only engage at a superficial level with the topic? My money is you can’t even locate Israel on a map at this point. But thanks for having an opinion on the subject. I’m not surprised as this has been the most you can get talking anything related to geopolitics on this platform.

Par for the course. Searching for specifics or facts of a matter is not being a contrarian. It’s called doing due diligence without letting bias cloud your view. We all have narratives we wish to paint. But unfortunately reality is more complicated than yapping online about how Nazzi or not Israel is. That’s the difference between online virtue signaling and someone who is interested in pursuing the truth.

Why, do the details make Israel look good? Is there a reason to shy away from having a meaningful discussion or is it better to hide behind memes and catchphrases

Well, there you have it. The most unproductive statements as usual. If you don’t know the specifics, why comment? Why not discuss the actual policies or the historical details? Why live in the realm of memes and buzzwords? Oh wait… I know why

Wow. What an insightful response. I stand by what I said earlier: You guys have no idea what you’re talking about.

Why was it turned down, Geneva? Care to elaborate?

You are correct. Israel, in the present does not accept the two state solution. Hence why I was talking about the past.

1. Why was it rejected by PLO when it was on the table?.

2. Show me where Hamas is open to a two state solution.

3. What is the meaning of “from the river to the sea”

Because I said it was on the table several times in the past. And they wrote:

Very cool and false

???

What is the benefit from lying? I don’t get it. This is all basic info.

The two-state solution is supported by many countries, and the Palestinian Authority. Israel currently does not support the idea, though it has in the past. The first proposal for separate Jewish and Arab states in the territory was made by the British Peel Commission report in 1937.

It was also on the table at Camp David.

I think we can track down several times two state option was on the table, starting as early as 68

Because people aren’t interested in solutions. They really just want to talk about the genocidal colonialist imperialist western project. And then move on. With little consideration or forethought for either the Palestinians or the Jews - literally anyone living in the region.

Case example: Hasanabi fans cheering Hezbollah rockets hitting areas inside Israel. But because the rockets have incredibly low precision they were frequently hitting Arab quarters in Haifa and elsewhere.

To sum up: whenever you talk to anyone about me or ip first establish how much they actually understand about the conflict before continuing the conversation any further. My experience is that most people online are locked behind memes and virtue signaling while having absolutely no comprehension of what in actually going on there