Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T

TheAvarageNerd

@ TheAvarageNerd @lemmy.world

Posts
4
Comments
10
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Whats the worst game mechanic?

    Jump

  • I can think of one counter example: In Death Trash, there's an escort quest, where you have to guide a blind guy with a shot gun through some kind of factory. He's as much of a liability is the devs could make him, running in and shooting blindly in all directions as soon as a combat encounter starts. It kinda turns the whole thing into a mission where the challenge is to defeat the enemies before the person you're escorting gets a chance to kill you both. (I guess that's what all the bad escort missions also boil down to, but in this case it's very explicit, which makes it funny.) They also kept it quite short and do it only once, so it works out. Still, it's the only escort quest I've ever done, that I've actually liked.

  • China launches campaign to keep killjoys off the internet

    Jump

  • I'm especially glad how this government campaign focuses on a clearly defined terminology that differentiates between trolly doom posting and affected people in a bad situation just expressing themselves online. It's great how they don't just use subjective terms like "negative content" or "sensationalized" or "trivial" , and then straight punish platforms for posts fitting these very wide terms. Cause you know, platforms definitely won't be overly careful with what they allow, when there's a threat of actual punishment. This is definitely a well thought out campaign, that's well thought out to take care of some unfortunate citizens.

  • How do you handle overeating caused by boredom and innatentiveness?

    Jump

  • Somebody once recommended pumpkin seeds as a snack to me. Not because they are especially healthy or something like that, but because they are really annoying to peel. Yes, I could eat them unpeeled, but the entire point of the idea is to make the snacking just a bit less rewarding. I tried it. Worked for maybe a week or so before I stopped. But it had a much more interesting long term effect: it got me used to unsalted nuts as viable snacks. Of course I immediately fell back into my old habits after the pumpkin seed experiment, but from then on I made sure to always buy a pack or two of unsalted nuts or seeds or dried fruits together with my other snacks. And at some point I managed to figure out the one rule that worked for me, and had the biggest impact long term: only buy new snacks once I've fully run out of old ones. And maan, that bag of wallnuts/peanuts/pumpkin seeds/dried apples could last for a long time. In turn I also started snacking on stuff that I didn't really consider a snack before. Like, I'm bored, and the only snack in my cupboard is a bag of wall nuts - so I'd make myself a cucumber salad instead (which is just cucumber and soy sauce. Maybe some olive oil if I'm feeling fancy) . I didn't really stop snacking. And the amount I am eating hasn't really gone down either. But what I'm eating has become a lot less fatty and sugary in general. It took me about five years of very slowly changing the ratio of sweet snacks to healthy snacks, and by now I basically never have more than one single pack of cookies, chips or chocolate at home (which is gone within a day, but it'll take about a week before I buy another one). At social events I find myself constantly eating whatever is on the table. But all in all, my weight is very slowly, but consistently, going down, and I am feeling better about myself in general.

    Tldr: buy a bag of unpeeled pumpkin seeds, and force yourself to peel each one of them before eating it. See where the journey takes you.

  • No Stupid Questions @lemmy.world
    TheAvarageNerd @lemmy.world

    If I stood on a precision scale and farted, would I get lighter or heavier?

  • What is something unexplained that you experienced?

    Jump

  • I have deja-vues surprisingly often. Every once in a while, I'm talking to somebody about a certain topic, or doing a specific thing in a specific location, and I get this memory that I've seen this exact thing happen in a dream some time ago. The weird thing about that is that I usually forget my dreams right after waking up. I know I have vivid dreams, but their contents is usually gone from my mind within seconds of waking up. It's probably just my brain doing things. But some irrational part of me believes that I have some weak form of cassandras curse, where I am allowed to see the future, but not allowed to remember it.

  • No Stupid Questions @lemmy.world
    TheAvarageNerd @lemmy.world

    How is spontaneous betting (as portrayed by comics and movies) supposed to work?

  • Exposure might cause suffocation

    Jump

  • I know how little I know about chemistry. The stuff on that page probably makes sense. But this just made me laugh.

  • Snake causes power outage, Tokyo-Osaka shinkansen services disrupted

    Jump

  • Was it a boomslang? Is this the alternative ending to bullet train?

  • CIA deputy director’s son killed while fighting for Russia in Ukraine, investigation claims

    Jump

  • I was wondering, so I checked out the first guy on Wikipedia. The image isn't lying about him, but the chief of staff part is sensationalizing it a bit. Dude was a career soldier since world War one, rose through the ranks and was chief of staff for an entirety of two weeks. Neither the German nor the English Wikipedia article on him really shine a clear light on his opinions. But he was definitely involved in the planning for military operations of the Nazis against the soviet union, and hunting down "partisans" in the occupied areas. According to the German wiki, one biographer claims that he did that as "humanely as possible given the circumstances" and "taking care of civilians as much as possible" (quotes roughly translated by myself), whereas some other historian cites some evacuation event at that time as clear evidence that he wasn't that humane.

    I personally feel quite confident in calling him a Nazi. He stood next to Hitler during the stauffenberg bombing and got injured (that was while he was chief of staff), He was suspected of being involved in the planning, but there was no evidence. And apparently he told the Gestapo everything he knew about the attackers, fully supporting the investigation against the conspirators. (to be clear, that last part isn't stated like that in the articles, but I think it is a fair interpretation of what it sais). He also saw it as a duty of a Soldier in the Reich to fight on the east front, despite explicitly believing that that fight was a lost cause, and that many would die a needless death.

    After the war, he gave testimony at the Nürnberg trials, and later worked together with the US army building up west German forces against the communists. (my personal interpretation: he had experience fighting against Russia, so they kept him involved.) Dwight Eisenhower liked him so much, he involved him majorly in the development of some European defense forces. At that point I got tired of reading, and only skimmed over the rest. Stuff continued, he built up the west German army, and later got his job at NATO. I did not read up on what that job actually was, and what he did in that role. But at this point I have no reason to doubt that it was a high level position, doing strategic stuff against the Soviets.

    So, the guy was surely a Nazi, definitely a chief of staff under Hitler, and he did later hold a high position at NATO. Why would I call the image sensationalizing it, when it's true? Cause explicitly calling him "Chief of Staff under Hitler" in the way it is in the image to me implies to me that he was a major thought leader in fashism. But everything I read about him makes him more the just-following-orders type of Nazi. Still a Nazi though. I also kinda understand how he ended up at NATO. I see it as a product of it's time, and something we should acknowledge. US took in Nazi scientists to put people on the moon, and they apparently also took in (high ranking) Nazi soldiers to prepare/fight against the Soviets. But to me this doesn't necessarily imply some Nazi conspiracy inside NATO. I don't think someone like that should be in a top level position in that organization today. But he was, and given the circumstances, he was probably even a fitting choice. That alone should be reason enough to do better today.

    Sources: the English and German Wikipedia articles on Adolf Heusinger. Was my first time reading up on him, on mobile on a train. Hope I did enough to separate what the articles said about the guy from my interpretation on it.

  • Deleted

    Am I the only one who feels uncomfortable about many Americans constantly calling people "black" and "white" and making such a big thing about it?

    Jump

  • I think I have to point out, that the Nazis weren't the only ones discriminating against and slaughtering Jews in Europe. There's a long history of that, going back centuries. Ever heard of the cruscades for example? They didn't limit themselves to killing non-Christian only in the holy lands. The Nazis were just the ones who did the killings on an industrial scale. But their reasoning for doing it goes way, way back. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Jews

    This doesn't excuse anything the Nazis did, or any form of discrimination, but I just feel it's very dishonest to limit our view of anti-semitism in Germany (and Europe in general) to a fifteen year period, when it's definitely been there a lot longer.

  • No Stupid Questions @lemmy.world
    TheAvarageNerd @lemmy.world

    Why does the winter solstice mark the beginning of winter, and not the center?

  • Judge says he must still approve sale of Infowars to The Onion

    Jump

  • Detailed answer: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GmDNz7irGgw

    TLDW: there's two main parties (excluding lawyers and that kinda stuff) who would receive the money. As it stands right now, one of them would receive 98%, whereas the other would be left with barely anything. The Onion made a deal, that would cut into that 98%, and give the other party 100000 dollars more than what they would get with any other bid if it was shared according to the "proper" split. In return the 98% party gets paid out the rest of their due (potentially more, potentially less) with revenue from running the site.

    I watched the video when it came out. If memory serves me correctly, the 98% party are parents from North Carolina, the others are from Texas. The percentage I wrote is probably wrong too. But it's definitely a massive discrepancy. The Onion worked this deal out in collaboration with both parties, and there's definitely a prosocial aspect in the NC parents declining a large chunk od money so the other victims can get more. Though both the NC parents and The Onion could potentially earn back that amount by running the website.