While I do admit that the latter option is much funnier, it's probably the former. That or they built all the above-ground rooms perfectly to scale, but didn't know the exact layout of the service/security tunnels? Idk, but that is definitely an odd choice of wording
You're giving him a LOT of "benefit of the doubt". On a larger scale, the whole argument of federal vs state rights is really just a more nuanced way for them to make a "not in my backyard" argument. They want the states to be able to choose not because it would give more freedom or anything like that, it's because they want THEIR state to be able to make something illegal, which is the opposite of more freedom
How the fuck is "acquitted conduct sentencing" allowed and not a flagrant violation of justice? What the hell happened to "innocent until proven guilty"?
I mean, I never said I did. I'm just throwing out another possibility (that has happened before) so that people don't just walk away taking the meme at face value without engaging with it
He may not have been fully aware of what he was being filmed for. This wouldn't be the first time a famous actor had been tricked into being part of an anti-science video:
In what way? The article mainly presents historical facts, not ideological theories. And when it does present theories, it does so within the historical context surrounding it. That was the whole point of the article, that one's view of history directly relates to their political leaning. If you want to be fair and balanced but refuse to acknowledge that one side is clearly doing more criminal/immoral acts and/or just straight up lying than the other party, then you're not being fair at all; you're giving false credibility to an obvious conman simply because you don't want to admit you've been played
I'll give you 3 guesses