Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T
Posts
0
Comments
2050
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • and over your neighbor's dog?What's great for a snack,And fits on your back

  • With his magic stick, Wobbufet

  • Thank you for realizing what most AI fans fails to realize!

    60 billion is a pretty reasonable ballpark for what AI companies are making. It's closer to 50b annualized (so 35b for real) in 2025 , but same ballpark. What they're actually SPENDING is an entirely different number. The 600 billion is a quick-and-dirty extrapolation from this sum of capital expenditure by the 5 biggest AI companies. Note that OpenAI direct spending isn't in there, because they're not reporting it, but OpenAI is mostly Microsoft.

    Some adding up from the WSJ top-4 here for 2024: https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/tech-giants-double-down-on-their-massive-ai-spending-b3040b33

    130 billion from microsoft: https://www.cfodive.com/news/microsoft-capex-grow-slower-rate-cfo-ai/746947/

    75 billion from alphabet here: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/04/alphabet-expects-to-invest-about-75-billion-in-capex-in-2025.html

    72 billion from meta here: https://fortune.com/article/meta-q1-earnings-revenue-profit-beat-ai-capex-raise

    11 b from tesla: https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-expects-capital-expenditure-exceed-11-bln-2026-2027-2025-01-30

    And the same from apple: https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:AAPL/explorer/capex/

    That brings us to a quick 600b in 2 years in expenses, which are climbing, and some 50b in income, with absolutely zero profit. And that's a problem, because all that capex is not infrastructure, it's mostly consumable GPUs that will be worn out in a few years and insane salaries.

  • So, in 2024 and 2025, humans will spend something like 600 billion of LLMs. That's about as much money as the entire Apollo program plus 2 entire International Space Stations for 40 years plus 5 copies of the longest bridge in the world, and then you'll have money left to end world hunger for a year.

    But instead, we have funny pictures, hallucinations and a semi-ok-ish summary machine that only rarely inserts random phrases. With possibly the worst RoI since Enron

  • That's a lot of drones to fire at a target. But I love that they got it!

    EDIT: I'm an idiot, and english is a dumb language.

  • I doubt these types of drones have complex detonators. They might be armed before take-off, meaning they'll probably explode on impact when shot down. Destroying the warhead in the air is MUCH harder than just breaking the drone enough to crash it.

  • Steady

    Jump
  • 95% is the lower limit of being fine.

    80% is "You should go to a hospital. No, I mean by ambulance"

  • I'm a very firm believer in the fact that safety features should be annoying and uncomfortable. Your lane assist needs to beep loudly every time it moves you back, thereby not only keeping you safe, but indirectly conditioning you to keep between the lanes to avoid the annoying beep.

  • Easy to state but do you have any proof of the connection?

    How about the results section in abstract of the paper, which mentions "association" six times and "cause" zero times.

  • Well, the right could fix that very easily by saying something easy and previously undoubted. Something like "Nazis are bad".

  • It also spreads via hands (and toys). Getting tested is pretty important.

  • And I felt the need to point out that Russia invaded Ukraine long before 2022 when the author pretends this all started.

  • He was a conservative so my money is on "everything I do I OK, everything you do is wrong by definition"

  • Sucks to be this guy, but he's obviously not a native Russian, and chose to live in Russia after they had invaded Ukraine. I can't really bring myself to feel even remotely bad for him.

  • Also, you can zoom in, it's a decent resolution.

  • https://ehrs.upenn.edu/health-safety/lab-safety/safety-alerts/ultracentrifuge-explosion-damages-laboratory

    This is a famous example from when they didn't have alarms. The don't just happily wobble across the room.

    The safety shielding in the unit did not contain all the metal fragments. The half-inch thick sliding steel door on top of the unit buckled allowing fragments, including the steel rotor top, to escape (Image 3). Fragments ruined a nearby refrigerator and an ultra-cold freezer in addition to making holes in the walls and ceiling. The unit itself was propelled sideways and damaged cabinets and shelving that contained over a hundred containers of chemicals.

  • Nothing quite like the sound of several kilos of solid steel getting turned into confetti

  • Shh

    Jump
  • Also, I would LOVE to buy stuff not wrapped in plastic, but it doesn't exist. There are no glass bottles of milk anymore, no soy-butcher

  • O hai

    Jump
  • It's called mitosis