Skip Navigation

TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)

@ TSG_Asmodeus @lemmy.world

Posts
5
Comments
261
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Users of Lemmy resort to downvoting when they can’t defend their arguments.

    You got absolutely obliterated because you posted two links to 'articles,' one of which is just some guys blog, and then refused to defend anything the articles said.

    Also you don't 'defend' a counter argument. You started the argument, offered a blog as 'proof' of an issue, when pressed on what the blog said you backed down and refused to defend it, and you just accuse everyone around of you of not having independent thought.

    It is a fact that humans are more eager to show their disapproval than approval for something, like in restaurant reviews, where the only people who bother to leave a review are those with bad experiences.

    YOU LITERALLY DID THIS. A guy said 'The Godot Engine is getting better every day.' in a post about Microsoft screwing up an app and you, yes, you started complaining about the team behind the engine! You're like the living embodiment of irony, hahahahahaha

  • 🤘 666 minutes, that's metal! 🤘

  • Kaboom is a regular poster on the conservative community on Lemmy and also an actual fascist. Is it really at all surprising they’re complaining about it?

  • That is until they kicked everyone out for being “nazis”

    Point to a comment where I show support for nazis.

    You are the one who keep bringing up Nazi's. You can't bring it up, have people agree it's good to remove Nazi's, and then say "whoa I support the people kicked out, I don't support nazi's" after you yourself said they were kicked out for being nazis.

    You're your own unreliable narrator and it is both hilarious and embarrassing.

  • I didn’t read the articles, and don’t care about how they frame the issue. This is for the guy who asked what I was talking about.

    So you... posted articles you didn't read in support of yourself, but you won't defend them?

  • Why would anyone listen to game engine devs on political matters?

    (Quick edit because I can't believe I have to say this: If you think people saying other people are allowed to be gay is 'political' you seriously, seriously need to reevaluate your beliefs.)

    I don't know, why are you whiny babies talking about it? Look at the topic of this fucking post. It's about a Microsoft app that's malware.

    Yet.. what's this? The people whining about people being helped brought it up, unwarranted, and inserted into discussion. So my answer is to ask your self.

  • instead of pandering

    Seriously do you guys read what you're writing after you write it? Is there no moment of introspection where you go "Huh, so they're helping a minority group that is currently being attacked by powerful members of our society... by being inclusive. I wonder if that is a net good, and that helping people under attack is a sign of strength and not 'pandering'?" or do you skip to "People I don't like are openly accepted by others, and their acceptance is abhorrent to my backing of their" (checks notes) "video game engine. I must rage at this horrible injustice!"

    The sheer volume of queer people who've made the games you play would cause you to froth at the mouth. Those same queer people can't even be out anymore without being shot at a gay bar by some fanatic, or walk down the street and not get assaulted. The humanitarian actions of a company that accepts donations is not reliant on checking with each backer to ask if they're okay helping people. Fuck them if they aren't.

    I think you should take a look in the mirror and think, really think, about if a company helping people is in any way abhorrent to you, and what that says about you. Because I know that you know someone impacted by the opposite of that help, and you know their lives improve every time someone who isn't queer, or a visible minority, or a woman, steps out and says "No, fuck this, we're helping these people."

    You can be that person.

  • Lol, "excessive pandering to LGBT..."

    Brave little CIS boi standing up to Big Gay, what a fucking hero.

  • We've already lost that battle sadly. Alberta has Smith (think Marjorie Taylor Greene), the Cons, while refusing to admit climate change is real, and with a leader who spent his entire political career trying to repeal abortion rights/gay rights, have locked away the vote of men with 51%+.

    In 2022, 41% of Con voters supported Trump. In 2024, it's increased to 44% (higher than Biden or Harris in both, though.)

    In addition, the Canadian Right-Wing's favourite Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, heads up a global 'get Right-Wing governments elected' organization.

    So I wish you the best of luck as well, though I fear we are on similar Germany-in-the-1930's path).

    Help the women and LGBT people in your life, they're going to need it.

  • I hate to say it but the NDP need to replace Singh with someone more charismatic.

    Right now conservatives feel like the only other option because there’s also enough racists to not to vote for Singh.

    Let's be blunt, the last part is why Singh has to be replaced. This guy got us fucking dental care added to our universal healthcare and people fucking shrugged at it. Rural voters won't vote him, that's the 'issue' with him in charge.

    So the NDP will be forced to pick a white guy to lead and then they can start wrestling away voters from the Lib and Cons. It sucks, but I guess that's what Canada has decided it is.

    EDIT:

    Just to be clear, these are who Canadian voters preferred to win the presidency in the US:

    Those Con numbers are bleak.

  • Over 51% of men are voting for Poilivre in the next election. That's across all age groups. We're where we usually are: 5-10 years behind something the US is doing.

  • What? I feel like you need to explain this more.

  • I don't know why but I keep giggling at the cat. It is definitely silly.

  • Cool strawman, that isn't why they did it, or relevant.

  • TIL activists have to achieve their goals in a single act.