

Jip. Had to share it 😌


Jip. Had to share it 😌


Well, military equipment has a much higher rate of wear and maintenance, than you would expect. Things can become obsolete and unusable in a time span of month rather than years. But sure. Let’s simply compare them to personal computers.


All this backdoor fantasies. Why make it harder than needed? USA can easily deny spare parts, new rockets or software updates… or weight in other weapon systems like the Abrams tanks and Apache helicopters Poland has. They could be grounded easily.


I would propose a deal. USA can pay for SAMP/T, NASAMs, IRIS-T (and get the Patriot battery when it gets freed from duty, maybe 2030ish).


I was under the impression that he just echoed, what Ahmed al-Sharaa said (well knowing he would say something similar or worse without anyone else taking the lead)


If you adhere to the strict definition of “A tank is an armoured fighting vehicle intended as a primary offensive weapon in front-line ground combat.” you are right.
Still. While we see less tank on tank combat, we see a lot of tanks shooting at fixed positions. Same goes with IFVs as they unload troops or enable tactical advances. They are far from being obsolete but they’re using smaller windows of opportunity. And sometime it takes a lot of anti tank drones before a tank had a mission kill. They’re still valuable tactical assets.
Edit: found the image which explains the definition problem at reddit.



Difference is the above mentioned are armored.
An army is not only tanks with big fat guns. All the mentioned assets lay the groundwork for any meaningful operation. What good are drones, if you cannot get a foothold and bring in forces to occupy landscapes?


I mean, tanks and IFVs with infantry take and hold ground.
Drones are use to harass units, saturate AD and basically deny ground taking advances.
These are different tactical issues with their own importance.


A nuthead will still tell you that wind is no equivalent because of missing winds.
You might have to factor PV and batteries in to make a even better point.


Usually they prefer other platforms.


For gaming, it is said to be slower in comparison to ext4. I’m personally not chasing FPS, but I know a lot of people doing so.
My gut feeling tells me, that all the data integrity checks are better used for real important data, and not for some media streaming (I’m using ZFS in corporate context).


Maybe, except for your gaming partition (ext4).


Ist das nicht ne Frage für die !main@feddit.org -Community, wo das auch diskutiert wurde? (Oder wird das Community-weise umgesetzt?)


It is illegal but common practice.


Depends on the business. We’ve got a ridiculous minimum wage of 13,90€ . Most honest restaurant collect the tips and split them, so even the cooking staff receives something.
For employees the tip is tax free. Businesses owner have to pay taxes.
With the most tips being payed via card (10-25% preselectable), I doubt that the staff sees any of it.


Every European country has its own valid culture of tipping. Some consider tipping unfriendly or even hostile.
In Germany you used to gratify a special service or outstanding servers.
Sadly this gets americanized already.


Some recommended https://ghostarchive.org/ . I didn’t test it thoroughly.
I’m still checking on videos on youtube where people use currently available boards/laptops and test and compare them to ARMs. In my opinion planning 2027-2030 hardware purchases and a full commitment is still too early.
There will most- ikely be a lot of movement be it chip-wise and with linux support.