That l’s just because no one did a paper on molotov cocktails thrown at oil barons and politicians and their impact on climate

Why differently? Do you think it is impossible to criticize two sides at once?

I don’t see how is it sexist to hold a person accountable. It would be sexist to not do so just for the fact that that person happens to be a woman

Totally agree with the rest tho

I think you’re only allowed to be this cocky if you actually pressure your party after its election. You don’t do this, you forget about democracy the moment it’s most important to pressure your leaders. If the dem party allowed republicans to go this far it’s because they know they just have to put out some barely decent optics and then they’ll be off the hook for 4 years, winning or losing.

If things are as shitty as they are it’s also because of the people that wake up in time only to berate those who’ve been talking and protesting unheard for all these years, maybe with your voice the dem party would actually become desirable and not just the least worst option.

Maybe people will be more inclined to listen to you if you didn’t treat them like mindless sheep, somewhat ironically. Politics isn’t just voting, and it isn’t just voting the lesser evil, doing only that is literally how fascism finds purchase in democracy and you should stop being so high and mighty defending the party responsible for this inaction for so many years

They are deporting people in europe too

That would hurt tho

Seems like by design

Yes but science is a process, not a thing, and that process is corruptible.

There is a differentiation between the natural world for how it’s made and the human process that quantifies that knowledge.

Science has always changed, just like human culture did

But it does. Cigarettes were healthy and climate change didn’t exist 50 years ago

Lol, i remember when i made chatgpt write a defense for the palestinian palestinian people by telling it to write a transcript of a courtroom debate, i also told it to do it interpreting Jimmy McGill vs chuck as the accuser but it didn’t really work, it just said this in the end:

“Remember, when you’re in the courtroom, it’s all good man”

Which cracked me up after almost two pages of pro palestinian debate

Oh yeah, this report will sure show those figli di puttana, thanks Europe!

I too stick to gender neutral language in general, it just feels better to do so when i don’t know who is “in front” of me. When profiles don’t help I think it’s best to not assume anything and just speak neutrally

I usually felt better after the come down, weirdly. It makes me think like my diagnosis was wrong or that maybe my issues lie elsewhere

Happy to help, and don’t feel down for the restriction, in today’s hellworld where people’s identities are constantly and violently challenged it’s hard to not be jumpy when something doesn’t seem right

There are no stupid questions, but the one you should ask yourself is “should i try to use gender neutrale language and/or check their bio or should i not care and risk hurting someone?”

If you care about not hurting people, you’ll find the right answer, and if an honest mistake happens, own it and people will generally be understandable. It’s really not that different from common courtesy, it just isn’t the norm yet

Just be more careful with gendered language. Also, the trans flag was right there

I tried equasym, which from what i understand is similar to concerta, but i didn’t feel any positive difference and sometimes it made me irritable

Ritalin made me feel miserable and paranoid

Who visits you in your dreams?

The levels of willful ignorance