Lemmy is the wrong place to be if you want nuance. Most people here aren’t accustomed to thinking for themselves.

If you’re getting spaghetti it’s a skill issue.

If you vibe code, sure you’ll get slop. Ask it to do something to get X result, you’re leaving it room to think so you get slop. Tell it exactly what logic you want it to use, step by step like it’s a child, then you get the same you’d do yourself but faster.

Look at the PRs for quality-critical projects like the linux kernel and I guarantee you coudn’t tell which PR has some AI and which does not.

When you spoon feed it the algorithm, it’s good, at least better than your average programmer. You just have to make sure it doesn’t have too much thinking to do. Honestly people in here really overestimate the talent of most dev.

There was a comment somewhere I really liked: people thought it would be one junior dev with AI replacing 10 senior ones. In reality, it’s one senior dev with AI replacing 10 junior vibe coders.

It’s still so much faster. An experienced engineer spoon-feeding the AI the exact logic/algorithm to use is still faster than writing it by hand. I think a lot of people stopped early when AI was worse and/or before they started being good at using it.

I used to hate it too but once you realize how clueless most devs are it becomes more and more understandable.

True, but then again there are so many such things. If I go into the woods for my own enjoyment and accidentally get lost requiring a rescue, am I being selfish? What about skiing, mountain climbing and all such activities? They all involve first responders saving your ass.

Hell by that logic anyone who drives a vehicle on a public road for any non-productive reason is being selfish.

Why, who are they hurting?

Am I dumb or is that not supposed to be normal? With inflation you don’t expect it to go down, you expect it to go up a little bit every day.

“The housing market is doing better” doesn’t mean prices are going down, but rather that it isn’t going up as fast as it used to.

You think? Because the vast majority of innovation (beyond the first few) was done by men who either had money (or priviliege, which in that time was the same thing) or men who were paid (or rewarded in some way) by those who did, resulting in the same thing. People who had no money/privilege and were not paid/sponsored did not have time to innovate, they had to spend their day trying to survive.

If you were “paid” by your king/warlord or whoever, you think they allowed you to just go do the same for their enemy right after?

Besides, I think we can all agree that innovation has been incredibly fast since capitalism came along, though whether it’s a cause or correlation is debatable. If your argument is that they came up with fire without copyright, then I’m afraid it’s not a very good one.

This could work, but would require a big societal change that goes beyond the level of “copyright bad” going on in this thread.

Yes, this is exactly what happens. Lone humans just can’t do much on their own, you need money to fund you, and money doesn’t fund anything that isn’t going to make them more money.

You’re not stealing knowledge, you’re stealing someone else’s time, effort and money. There’s a reason there’s IP laws everywhere.

What then do you suggest as the alternative? Or is your suggestion just to stop innovation?

But then if you can’t copyright it companies wouldn’t invest money in it since it wouldn’t be profitable. That’s kinda the whole point of copyright, so that there’s an incentive for innovation. Why invest in R&D when you can just let your competitor do it and immediately steal it from then?

Whether they are or not doesnt matter, everyone calls them so and it’s almost certainly the kind of sites the OP had in mind.

Most piracy sites don’t host anything besides a simple frontend, they just embed videos from a variety of other websites nobody would deign use directly, because those sure as hell do have worse ads than youtube.

I’m not sure that 300 billion is even enough to pay for all the damages that were done to begin with, not much of a return on investment.

Ironic, this is basically lemmy in a nutshell.

What scheme, their last models have been so much better than OpenAI’s it’s no surprise people are moving to Claude.

That makes him immoral, not stupid. I swear people on here will call anyone they don’t like stupid.

He’s 80 and spent 6 of then as president. I don’t think you’d fare much better. Why blame a senile man rather than those who put him in place?l