Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
1
Comments
515
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I don't think either of them would have respected the treaty if they intended to do an arms race anyway

  • Yeah, try criticizing alcohol even here on lemmy, and you get an army of addicts getting so mad at the mere idea.

    Same for meat consumption.

    People don't defend smoking as much but yet it's still legal everywhere.

  • And they are helping it by saying this sentence.

  • It's not about rejecting the punishment, but how short it is

  • We know other kinds of brains than animal brains?

  • "We have to follow what people want to hear so that we look impartial"

    Strong take bro, big brain

  • The guy didn't just rape, he has a list of charges big enough to write a book and is a gigantic worthless piece of shit, just like his mother.

    All these news titles are trying to suck his butt for some reason

  • Je me suis mis à regarder des séries koréennes au lieu des bouses américaines qui sont universellement de la propagande d'extreme droite, et je dois avouer avoir été positivement surpris.

    Dire que je suis allé jusqu'à regarder la majeure partie de The Office, avant de trouver ces séries... Si j'avais sû je ne me serais pas infligé cette horreur

  • The main problem is far from being money

  • And the pyramid thing is, on top of a very debatable thing, absolutely not having anything else other than survival that can "support" eating meat.

    You're just saying random shit to make me waste my time, this conversation is definitely not worth anymore effort.

  • Ah yeah so you are indeed talking out of your ass

  • What are you even talking about?

    Other than survival needs, nothing warrants killing and eating sentient beings, in case you were suggesting otherwise. And if you were, then your morals are completely fucked up.

  • Yeah and totally not the beginning with the romanticised rape scenes of a kid.

  • I know that most humans are not unable to survive without meat, it's basic biology and nutrition.

  • Maybe Iran should give them all of the missiles then, so that they can have a peace of mind. That's the good thing with missiles, there's an easy way to ship them

  • Fascism*

  • All these examples typically don't have a majority agreeing on it. You think that there is a majority that strongly wants to ban private planes, stop sexism, or so? Nah, most people don't care. But veganism is actively, strongly opposed to animal abuse, so if a majority is vegan, things would change.

    And I never said that people who eat meat should be bullied, my point is that eating meat shouldn't be seen as completely fine, and especially not as compatible with veganism. It's like saying "yeah, I'm antifa+nazi", it doesn't make sense and only weakens the concept of veganism

  • "Mull that one over" :')

    This argument is so bad I have to answer.

    • Animals are bred then killed for meat. All those animals that you mentioned are going to get killed. If the meat industry crashed and they killed all the animals, it would effectively end in fewer deaths as (I can't believe I even have to write that down) killing generations and generations of animals is worse than killing a single generation of these same animals
    • Nothing says that the industry would kill them, they could release them or whatnot, and as the previous point mentioned it would never kill as much as if the industry continues
    • What farmers do is unrelated to consumers. If I tell you that if you don't buy my slaves, I'll kill them, are you the murderer if you refuse? Of course not, that's stupid.
    • Nothing prevents governments for getting involved, which would be another way to prevent the killing
    • Are you really trying to pretend that killing and eating animals is okay, because else we would kill animals?

    Seriously, if you're going to debate in bad faith, at least put some work in your fake arguments.

  • What?

    If 100% of people eat 5% meat, meat consumption continues.

    If only 50% (or even less) of people are vegan, meat production gets banned.

    How can you believe it would ever be the same? The world cannot be reduced to a single percentage, this argument is really absurd.