Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S

Solumbran

@ Solumbran @lemmy.world

Posts
1
Comments
525
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Removed

    Korean researchers build brain-like chip from shells and beans

    Jump

  • That's why the effort needs to be done to stop AIs legally, and by disabling profit from them (or disabling capitalism altogether but that's another subject), not by continuing to maintain the hype and investments in AIs.

  • Removed

    Korean researchers build brain-like chip from shells and beans

    Jump

  • Ah, finally, a way to make more AI crap. Because we needed to have more of it.

  • Stop ze Coke Sigmund it is making you Insane!

    Jump

  • If they did maybe he would have

  • Une question (peut-être pas complètement) con à propos de postes de radios Internet et/ou Dab

    Jump

  • Tu penses quoi d'un machin comme ça ? (Trouvé un peu au pif, je sais pas si ça vaut quoi que ce soit) https://www.amazon.fr/dp/B0F2GJRMGV

    Sinon tu en as qui ont une télécommande, ça pourrait pas t'aller ? C'est pas exactement pareil mais bon

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Because jokes about pedophilia are just creepy?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Why are people upvoting this?

  • Une question (peut-être pas complètement) con à propos de postes de radios Internet et/ou Dab

    Jump

  • Pour clarifier, tu cherches spécifiquement quelque chose qui a une bonne quantité de boutons physiques d'accès direct aux favoris/presets ?

  • Boiling lobsters alive to be banned in UK animal cruelty crackdown

    Jump

  • All the braindead people incoming to scream "but they taste better when boiled alive" without even seeing the problem

  • He made beer that’s also a vaccine. Now controversy is brewing

    Jump

  • So we have vaccines that work and are tested.

    And he's trying to sell something that is untested, but an alcoholic beverage, which is known to be bad for health.

    Yeah, I'm sure this is not just about money and he actually cares about people's health.

  • US military to stop shooting live animals to train medics for the battlefield

    Jump

  • "Animal rights group say the animals are supposed to be anesthetized"?

    What. The. Fuck?

    "Human rights group say the nazis should anesthetize the jews before gassing them"

    How can you be part of a group supposed to defend animal rights, and yet be fine with the idea that a bunch of braindead psychos is going to take them and stab them for fun, as long as the animals are sleeping?

  • Oh yes...

    Jump

  • The office is bad all throughout though

  • Removed

    What popular belief do you disagree with?

    Jump

  • That if something is useful or necessary, then you can never say that it is bad.

    A simple example of that would be the military.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • It's a hard challenge to manage to be very racist while at the same time trying to help against discriminated.

  • Good boy

    Jump

  • Alcoholism is that ingrained in society, huh.

  • I was giving Enterprise another chance, and even Archer was starting to grow on me in season 2. Then season 3 happened and he became a war criminal.

    Jump

  • Yeah so you're really set on talking to yourself.

    I am talking about objectification. The concept of showing someone as primarily an attractive body, as if they were nothing else.

    And yes, just in star trek I mentioned instances of it, and I didn't even get started on shits like Enterprise.

    Of course comic books have an extreme tendency to show unrealistic body standards, and the fact that the idea of a "normal" guy now is a bodybuilder says a lot, but that's not about objectification. When Star Trek shows Riker naked in his bathtub just for the sake of it, yeah, that is. And yes I'm against it.

    I think you are so stuck in your vision of things that you just cannot admit that someone would see things differently.

  • I was giving Enterprise another chance, and even Archer was starting to grow on me in season 2. Then season 3 happened and he became a war criminal.

    Jump

  • Yes and sexism is about gender, not sex.

    But sure, let's continue on this bad faith argument, since my point was that I am against objectification of both men and women, so whether it is about sex and gender it's the same since it's related to neither. So how is it sexist?

  • I was giving Enterprise another chance, and even Archer was starting to grow on me in season 2. Then season 3 happened and he became a war criminal.

    Jump

  • Yeah, indeed.

    Still waiting for you to explain how something is sexist when it's not related to gender btw.

  • I was giving Enterprise another chance, and even Archer was starting to grow on me in season 2. Then season 3 happened and he became a war criminal.

    Jump

  • Her outfit matters as it makes the character incoherent. No one in the show wondered why a battle robot would wear heels. She didn't say why either. As such, her character already doesn't make sense. It is heels and a boob armor, it could have been a broom up her ass, either way it doesn't make sense and it's not about "her looks" but about the implications of the character deciding to wear something like this. Borgs are supposed to be ultra-rational, this makes her character stupidly incoherent.

    And how is the fact that a kid is shown as being sexualized and romanced by adults characters about her looks? My point was that she's a kid mentally, and yet portrayed sexually, how is that about looks? Of course, the underlying meta explanation is that she was just a sex object put in the show for her looks, but my point was precisely that characters in the show, since they don't know that, are apparently fine with dating a kid. This is a horrible character, no matter her looks.

    Overall, most of my points were not about her looks, but they do relate to it since the character was made badly just so that it could be objectified. To try to make you understand, her looks are not the problem, but the main reason that pushed the writers to make a bad, incoherent, shitty character. And of course I didn't even start digging into the things you mentioned because they are too many and less bad than what I mentioned, but yes, her actions and choices are incoherent, her relationships weird and bad and basically child abuse, and her performance was pretty abysmal. I just focused on the initial, core problem of the character, which is that it was written lazily because they didn't care about it making sense, about picking a proper actress, or about thinking about the moral implications of their choices, as all that they wanted was an object-woman.

  • I was giving Enterprise another chance, and even Archer was starting to grow on me in season 2. Then season 3 happened and he became a war criminal.

    Jump

  • Yeah so you're ignoring most of what I'm saying on purpose.

    I explained multiple times why the looks of seven, on top of being pure objectification which has negative consequences outside of the universe of the show, also have a pretty bad impact within the show, making it a bad character both from a meta and in-lore perspective.

    I even said that if everyone was dressed like her it wouldn't have the same impact (even though it would be far from fixing the character).

    If you're not going to debate in good faith there is no point, have a good day.