Skip Navigation

Posts
15
Comments
963
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Breakthrough Energy Ventures — a climate investment firm Gates founded — has bankrolled several nuclear startups, including fusion pioneer Commonwealth Fusion Systems

    What exactly has CFS pioneered? I am genuinely curious.

    Their wikipedia page states that they have yet to demonstrate net power generation (via fusion reactor) with the current target date set for 2027.

    Their SPARC concept seems to be based on the ARC concept which is described as having the following key benefit:

    The key technical innovation is to use high-temperature superconducting magnets in place of ITER's low-temperature superconducting magnets. The proposed device would be about half the diameter of the ITER reactor and cheaper to build.

    The sentence cites an article titled "Advances in magnet technology could bring cheaper, modular fusion reactors from sci-fi to sci-reality in less than a decade" from August 2015. Less than a decade indeed.

    Gate goes on to say the following:

    A growing number of big tech companies from Microsoft to Alphabet Inc.’s Google have inked power purchase agreements with nuclear startups [e.g. CFS] to secure future electricity supply. But Gates says there is still a long way off for those startups to deliver electricity at scale.

    “Nuclear as a whole won't be a gigantic contributor to data center electricity until 2035, and that's assuming everything goes well,” he said.

    I honestly don't understand what the article is trying to say (both explicitly and implicitly). Gates believes that we need to invest more into fusion and fission to compete with china [and change our attitudes to nuclear power]?

    I say all of this as someone who is generally supportive of nuclear power (I live in Ukraine, if not for our nuclear power plants, things would be far far worse with our electricity situation).

  • That's why the term "committed support [for russian genocidal imperialism]" is arguably a much better characterization of Lula's views than “turning a blind eye”.

  • What I read also concerned other regions, not only Crimea.

    I will give Lula the benefit of the doubt (I am assuming he knows nothing about russia or Ukraine), but yes, you can kick the russians out of Crimea (under putin or otherwise). If you want to do it, one easy supportive action would have been to allow high impact strikes deep into russian territory from day one of the full scale invasion.

    Or not reward them with Nord Stream II after they annexed Crimea in 2014 (Merkel).

    Generally speaking, being meek, cowardly and corrupt rarely contributes to any goals (military or otherwise).

  • I believe Lula da Silva publicly supported the annexation of currently occupied territories. It was presented in a more diplomatic manner, but I am talking about outcomes.

    Brazil hasn't legally recognized the occupation like Nicaragua, but from what I've read in our local (Ukrainian) media, it's more like committed support, as opposed to "turning a blind eye".

  • I believe Brazil basically supports russian occupation of Ukrainian territories (and extermination of Ukrainian citizens, language and culture).

  • Interesting! Will need to experiment with.

    Cheers!

  • Let's hope when one day Ivanishvili gets what he deserves and isn't able to run away to Moscow.

  • The US is a bigger military force (qualitatively and quantitatively) than all other NATO members combined (although UK/France are no slouches and some smaller countries like Poland, Sweden, Finland hold their own). This is a critical issue in holding back the russians.

    You denying this (and ignoring that russia is currently occupying 3 non-NATO members, Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia), says everything we need to know.

    The real irony is that I lean much more towards the Palestinian side, but that doesn't mean I am going to buying into "DATO forced poor putin to invade1!"

  • Find a new boogeyman to justify a "defense" organization that has never acted in self-defense.

    Made up in my head. Poland and Baltic nations totally didn't join NATO to protect themselves from Russian invasions like in Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia.

    You fake leftists are funny. Thankfully, no one gives a shit about you at all.

  • I have not, no.

  • Thank you for proving my point with your "BATO made putin do it" world salad!

    I couldn't have done a better job myself.

  • I am not a "lib", the very term "liberal" isn't even used correctly in North America.

    This was a very specific answer to specific claims (get rid of the US, stop collaborating with Israel). These are ridiculous statements in context of NATO's primary goal, defence against russian invasions.

  • Really sad. He wasn't even up for mobilization since he was 23 and he kills three other women (aged 29, 58, and 82) in addition to killing himself.

  • I hope you are right, sounds like a solid theory. :)

  • AFAIK, even having an external host won't really help in all cases. The big one being Thumbnail URL images which seem to only work for accounts on the same instance (even if you use an external hoster).

  • I hope you and your family end up in a russian internment camp!

  • There is some truth to that, but I think you generally want savvy individuals even in ceremonial positions

  • Seems reasonable in the video.

    But the "NATO opposition" is a massive red flag that suggests a complete inability to read and understand the russians.

  • This was not clear from the OP's screenshots, that's why I made some more commentary about the issue.

    I never said anything about Nazis at all.

    You generally have a positive view of tankies and their support for russian genocidal imperialism and their oligarch regime.

  • You fake leftists are so tedious.

    What I wrote, in the rant section, stands independently of the actions/views of OP.