That just makes no sense at all. You can tell because so many people are not just doing the bare minimum to survive and sitting on their arse for the rest of their time.
People have desires and ambitions. Making sure that basics such as food, shelter, education and healthcare are covered won't change that.
The Department of Conservation is very good at controlling rats, possums and stoats. It's harder to control cats (and dogs) because of irresponsible owners.
Conductor size is about current, not voltage, so I would expect 120V plugs to be bigger as they need to be rated yo 20A to be as useful as typical 240V/10A plugs.
Australia/NZ style plugs are much smaller than (and IMO superior to) the UK plugs despite both being 240V/10A
You shoot the dick in row 27 who took someone's window seat and made a scene about it then throw him to the bear.
If that's not enough you start lining up the people who magically don't hear the boarding-by-rows instructions and the request to raise their seat so the person behind can eat.
For the western world motorbikes are largely a luxury. Don't do the luxury thing AND don't wear a dead animal seems like a reasonable position to take.
It's all hallucinations. Sometimes the hallucinations are close enough to reality to be useful. Sometimes they're close enough to be plausible while also being wrong. Sometimes they're fucking ridiculous.
This "AI" technology is shit because it can't tell the difference.
This is a silly take. People are less likely to say no on the phone than they are to click no on a survey opt-in popup. And I am not even sure that Steam does a pop-up, users may have to go find the option to join the survey.
So there absolutely is a sampling bias. How significant it is and how/if Valve attempt to control for it doesn't seem to be public information but it is definitely there.
I'm using tumbleweed and getting my NVIDIA card to work was some effort but only because I was an idiot and didn't run the SUSE update tool that would have fixed everything for me :-/
I think most people would be ok with "AI" that actually did something useful and perhaps wasn't an unsustainable resource hog. The problem is that the current thing called AI doesn't do anything useful.
That just makes no sense at all. You can tell because so many people are not just doing the bare minimum to survive and sitting on their arse for the rest of their time.
People have desires and ambitions. Making sure that basics such as food, shelter, education and healthcare are covered won't change that.