Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
0
Comments
27
Joined
12 mo. ago

  • It's given me an idea of how we get there. Clearly, modern LLMs aren't near the level as seen in movies, but we will get there. We will move on from LLMs within a few years to a more adaptive model, as we further increase our understanding of AI and neural networks.

    I see modern LLMs as task tools, they can interpret our requests to pass onto a more intelligent model type which will save processing power needed from the newer AIs.

    People in this thread seem to have a lot of bias, they can't see how the tech will evolve. You need to keep an open mind and look at where tech is being developed, with AI, it will be new architectures.

  • You got this!

  • waltuh

    Jump
  • Don't be comparing Trump to my boy Mike.

  • Sounds like an issue with your network or routes. By design, WG is faster.

  • Please get some rest. You're oddly irritable and delusional and it can't be healthy.

  • You make weird assumptions seemingly based on outdated ideas. I'll let you be, perhaps you need some rest.

  • You are misunderstanding the tech. That's not how this works, models are trained often, did you think this was done only a few years ago? The fact that you called them bots says everything.

    You're just hating to hate on something, without understanding the technology. The efficiency I'm referring to is the MoE architecture that only got popular within the last year. There are still new architectures being developed, not that you care about this topic but would prefer to blindly hate on what's spewed from outdated and biased news sources.

  • As with almost all technology, AI tech is evolving into different architectures that aren't wasteful at all. There are now powerful models we can run that don't even require a GPU, which is where most of that power was needed.

    The one wrong thing with your take is the lack of vision as to how technology changes and evolves over time. We had computers the size of rooms to run processes that our mobile phones can now run hundreds of times more efficiently and powerfully.

    Your other points are valid, people don't realize how AI will change the world. They don't realize how soon people will stop thinking for themselves in a lot of ways. We already see how critical thinking drops with lots of AI usage, and big tech is only thinking of how to replace their staff with it and keep consumers engaged with it.

  • Help.

    Jump
  • Human history disagrees with you. At every single point in our existence, we have been trash. Doesn't matter what they believed in, what era, what continent, humans have always slaughtered, raped, taken, abused, etc., to get what they wanted.

  • I can't tell if you're serious or not. A bookmark bar will never be able to easily contain everything you need. It requires manual review (expanding the bar, manually browsing every bookmark and re-opening tabs [and you're suggesting to bookmark 50+ pages every week.. impossible]). So not only are you implying it would be better to add 2 - 3 additional steps to the workflow, but also you are missing the very functional fact that a bookmark bar is a lot less accessible than a scrollable tab bar with an instantly opened window with what you were working on.

    Tabs also remember where you are on the page. I read long studies, and implement complex projects. Bookmarks will re-open every tab at the start of the page, not word 600. There are just too many reasons as to why tabs are more functional than bookmarks and saving data to lists. A big part of it is the size of the persons workflow, someone with a smaller workflow may not be able to see how impactful those additional steps in the process are.

  • Yeah, that is just asking for data to be forgotten. The functional difference is:

    You have your browser with let's say 30 tabs. You can't forget what you need to, because they are always open. So to catch up, you have to close out your tabs or lose everything.

    Compared to adding something to a list, which requires you to manually go back and remember what you needed to do. But if you have 100 things to every week, and those constantly get added on, you will always lose data to return to if you're not actively tracking it, hence the tabs.

    It's a very simple concept. A lot of people have a lot less time to do all the things they need to during the week. People on their computers all day, or with less of a workload, can't comprehend this without opening their mind to a different perspective.

    I know, because I used to feel the same way about people who had 20+ tabs. But at that point in time, the thought of not having enough time to get to everything and adding 50+ things to do every week (meaning 200 - 400 new tabs every week) was foreign to me, and your suggestion makes it quite literally impossible without extra work involved, if you care to actually complete everything you wanted.

  • I used to feel the same way. But recently, I just don't have time to 'finish' each tab/section. When I was younger with more time, I could.

    For example, the first section of my browser is several self hosted apps I'm currently implementing. So, I don't want to lose the relevant forum posts/documentation.

    The second section is some articles I couldn't finish reading.

    The third section is something I'm researching for my work.

    Fourth are media tabs, some YouTube videos I haven't finished, a music tab, etc etc

    So basically, if I had time to read the articles, one section closed. Or finished my implementation, etc.

    The hard part this is this is every week. Always new projects, work or personal. Always new studies to read. Always new vids. You get the point.

  • You are clearly hurt, so I will let you rest. Ponder upon how to respond more contently and maturely in the future would be my advice. Would do you much better as you can read comments thoroughly and not make random implications. Best of luck to you in your journey, buddy.

  • The fact you can't address the point says everything.

  • It's simple. You said as long as there isn't effort for the reader, you dont mind. So you care.

    Then you said you don't care about the reader.

    Make up your mind? That's where your logic fails. But it's typical in online forums like this. People spend all day here.

    Again, I never said you couldn't type that way. I'm not sure why you keep responding as if I did.

  • Yep never said otherwise.. lol and you did say you cared in your first reply but I can see you don't follow logic too well so I'll leave it at that.

  • Very peculiar perspective denying the already established language standards of punctuation and capitalization... Autocorrect exists to show you the "corect" way.

    For anyone raised in a standard education system, there is effort to read comments like that. We've learned to pause, exclaim, incur emotion, and apply tension, all through punctuation and capitalization. Your comments are read as breathless long-winded statements for those of us who still subscribe to language standards..

    Thanks for the response, though.