I know content analysis or discourse analysis would find this outlet is very selective with words like "massacre" or active terms liks "kills". That's just its bias.
One, there's been no proof of rape happening by them (although there's probably some sexual assault and harassment, which is obviously terrible. I condemn Hamas, etc.). Two, you think they have a higher chance of getting the hostages back if they continue this indiscriminate bombing campaign over actual negotiation? There's a reason families of the hostages have been protesting Netanyahu. He doesn't give a shit about the hostages. He'd rather they all die than have an extended ceasefire.
So many of my searches lead to Microsoft forums where my exact issue is posted, MS asks for more information, then some auto-mod closes the issue because there wasn't any further follow up and they can't replicate it.
But then it just comes off hypocritical and disingenuous if you selectively apply pressure. Then it just looks like you're trying to give a competitive edge to US evil social media and preventing youth from learning about the situation in Palestine.
I don't see stores pulling out of Israel, confiscating their property, boycotting their vodkas, shutting them out of the bank systems, or any of the other countless stuff international governments did against Russia after their invasion of Ukraine.
You're right!