I don’t read it like that. The sentence just says that their pay rate has that amount, not that it is connected to them not being a union member.

There was this news report about a french scientist being denied entry to USA, because they critiqued the science budget cuts. While not arrested or something, it’s still telling.

I don’t think it’s preferential pay. It’s just that they pay more, somebody in the union also can get more money than the union minimum. Somebody not part of the union can get less or more than somebody in the union, just not below the union minimum.

It’s not that if they join the union that they get less money. The union + 0.5 just means that they earn better than the minimum and the employer gives them more than the minimum, because people like that.

At least that’s how it works where I live and union contracts are common.

Not everyone part of the union has to get exactly the union minimum, it’s just that you cannot legally get less. People might not be part of the union but they still fall under the union contract negotiated by the union, because it applies to the entire company.

“Even more news” general news and politics

“Trash taste” anime and japanese centric by 3 people who moved to Japan and are YouTubers

In comparison to the 20 documented ones

I have been using Uranus moons for all my devices.

Its a bit frustrating, as I didnt see any answer and couldnt clarify.

Yeah, that was the intention. but I guess it didnt fly.

What a bad fix.

if it doesn’t have that then it’s entirely speculation.

You are very close

I know one.

A description of the decision to choose the words is contained within the video. 1:05:18

I see that the context is a different one and i also understand formal logic (contrary to what the other comment on my post says)

It’s just that if the topic is pi, I find it potentially confusing (and not necessary) to construct a different example which is based on pi (pi in binary and interpreted as base 10) in order to show something, because one might associate this with the original statement.

While this is faulty logic to do so, why not just use an example which doesn’t use pi at all in order to eliminate any potential.

I did realize now that part of my post could be Interpreted in a way, that I did follow this faulty logic -> I didn’t

Is the 1.0010101 just another sequence with similar properties? And this sequence with similar properties just behaves differently than pi.

Others mentioned a zoo and a penguin. If you say that a zoo will contain a penguin, and then take one that doesn’t, then obviously it will not contain a penguin. If you take a sequence that only consists of 0 and 1 and it doesn’t contain a 2, then it obviously won’t.

But I find the example confusing to take pi, transform it and then say “yeah, this transformed pi doesn’t have it anymore, so obviously pi doesn’t” If I take all the 2s out of pi, then it will obviously not contain any 2 anymore, but it will also not be really be pi anymore, but just another sequence of infinite length and non repeating.

So, while it is true that the two properties do not necessarily lead to this behavior. The example of transforming pi to something is more confusing than helping.

It’s a theorem. It’s theoretical. This is like complaining about the 20 watermelon example being unrealistic: that’s not what it is about.

Optimization died when hw limitations are less severe

Latest also means automatic major upgrades without doing the steps necessary for said upgrade, or breaking functionality/changes.

See: https://medium.com/@mccode/the-misunderstood-docker-tag-latest-af3babfd6375

https://vsupalov.com/docker-latest-tag/

https://cloudmaniac.net/docker-container-never-use-latest-cicd-pipeline/

Having everything on latest seems a very bad idea.