Journalists love using AI as a source because it's a creative way of using the passive voice which sounds more neutral. Instead of attributing an action to a person like "Elon Musk's Website Used for Generating CSAM" historically they'd use something passive, impersonal and vague like "Vulgar Pictures Are Being Generated On X", but if you're relatively informed you read past the phrasing and picture how Musk is accountable. Now journalists can use the active voice so it appears more tangible but pin in on AI to sound neutral and hold nobody accountable, which serves the status quo.
I got Camellia's album that just came out and that I've been playing on repeat. Probably the most expensive digital album I've ever bought so I'm glad it'll all go to the artist. It's 17 tracks of J-core, speedcore, complextro if you're into that.
https://cametek.bandcamp.com/album/chimera-dragons
COVID fucked my tastebuds and ruined the taste of oranges for me. The price and boycotts certainly don't help, but I wonder if my experience is a common thing.
It's different in that it's now just one click away. The harder it is to do the less it would be abused.