Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
1
Comments
279
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Because the flipper doesn't run applications in the way q smartphone does. If you're a bit into hardware tinkering: Think of it more like an Arduino than a pi.

  • You won't get the AI stuff through. I'm working on a machine like you described and drilled a hole in it to provide power to a 3070 as the power supply wasn't beefy enough (and server power supplies are too expensive compared to a hole).

    This is the first generation where I can play around with local LLMs from what I can tell - even used the hardware for that is way more expensive :(

  • Friend, there is only one kind of dumb question: those that are statements with a question marks at the end of are simply a vehicle to place a statement.

    And even those are fine by me if the asking being realizes this within the discussion. ("Why are we allowing women to vote if they are that much dumber than men?" is a stupid question in my book - and even that can lead to "oh wow I always just assumed that to be true but (data/argument) made me realize that I was wrong!". Rare but can happen....)

  • What you describe are feature requests not issues.

    The reason you don't find them is simple: many projects don't want q myriad of form based user requests. Depending on the specific project it's either vote based or non existent in my experience.

    AOSP as specific example is mainly maintained by Google who are notorious for being very ... Wet in their own ways on how to do feature roadmaps.

    I think you're naked by both your life and that of the projects you want to support tougher by thinking about these things as issues. Just a rule of thumb m: it's an issue if it's not working as documented or behaving in a way that can be described in terms of "right" and "wrong", not preference.

    Otherwise it's a feature request.

    Your points for example are all aimed at quite advanced users. I'm not an AOSP dev but just looking at the way they developed their menus over TR years I'd be surprised if they'd share your evaluation.

  • Oh the trackers are against that because they fight all the way against people working against the community and I guess that they just see more leeches coming in this way.

    Personally I don't care about the individual background as long as it's at least a break even in the community.

    Good luck!

  • Just as a heads-up: expect some pushback just for asking.

    In general buying accounts is frowned upon on all private trackers I'm aware of, including the rule to ban bought accounts on sight.

    Several private trackers give out VIP status for people buying seed boxes through them though I guess there are some where you'd get an account in the first place through this.

    It all depends on your goals. Personally I wouldn't trust account sellers. I don't see a way for them to get accounts without it being quite easily identifyable for the respective pages.

    Personally I went the "hard" route but never tried to push into the cabal tier private trackers.

    Just remember to not screw your account within the first hours by not taking care of your ratio and the trackers rules.

  • Bin ich bei dir, das ist sowas, was man mit statischer Regel praktisch nur falsch machen kann... :(

  • Vergiss bitte die Bauordnung nicht. Zwei Parkplätze und sechs Meter Abstand zur Straße müssen sein!

    "Weil, das muss so"... Das war die Antwort aus meiner Frage "warum". Könnte ja Mal jemand kaufen, der zwei Autos hat...

  • But this is an American outlet reporting on science..

    """

     
            Earth's pole has drifted toward 64.16°E at a speed of 4.36 cm/yr during 1993–2010 due to groundwater depletion and resulting sea level rise
    
    
      

    """

    That was two clicks away - so you're right: the property science wasn't some in fridges or football fields or any of the US scales.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • One could argue they a reading service should not alter the thing that's read. Android is not a quantum state!

  • Removed

    SHUT THE FUCK UP!

    Jump
  • Understandable, he was right very often and "only" his tone was....unfiltered. but I ignore the "was right" part when using that phrasing :)

    I'd like to imagine that this would be close to the phrasing Linus himself would choose, although I could be off of course!

  • Take a sentence with 200 characters then.

    And your opinion is exactly that and doesnt match security research:

    For the following you're not the target group but others reading this who might want to make their lifes easier. Just from your way of writing I at least don't expect that minor sources like okta or the NCSC will change your mind.

    ( article links with high level descriptions and links to their primary sources)

    https://www.okta.com/identity-101/password-vs-passphrase/

    https://www.4bis.com/passphrase-vs-complicated-passwords-passphrases-are-best/

    https://specopssoft.com/blog/passphrase-best-practice-guide/

  • Removed

    SHUT THE FUCK UP!

    Jump
  • I really don't enjoy Linus' content without context I have to admit.

    He was an absolute dipshit back then and he's one of the few people I've read about who not only acknowledged that but also put effort into changing it - and succeeded.

    Yeah the newer mails are not as funny to third parties anymore but I'm really happy for him and especially the kernel devs around him.

  • There's a xkcd for that of course! Linking directly to the explain as it has more info but the important thing is: password guidelines tricked humans into thinking in a machine way about safe passwords but long pass phrases are more secure from an entropy point of view and way easier to remember!

    https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/936:_Password_Strength

  • DHL. Fucking DHL. Not sure if it fits your question but I got triggered badly here.

    They removed all forms of contact except WhatsApp and their shitty z broken chat bot. If there is ever a use case for LLM than this is it. But they use s system that can either sell you stamps or breaks.

    Oh but you can call them. Do you can talk to there chat bot. Once you've broken it enough for it to grant an audience with a human being the connection drops.

    I very rarely get worked up by broken systems but someone else chose to use this shit shoe and I'm now imprisoned in their web of bullshit.

  • Oh yeah I see...

    As some old philosopher once said: "shit's fucked, yo".

    Seems to be appropriate here.

  • Because a security engineer focused on cloud would rightfully say "pod security is not my issue, I'm focused on protecting the rest of our world from each pod itself.". With AWS as example: If they then analyze the IAM role structures and to deep into where the pod runs (e.g. shared ec2 vs eks) etc. then it would just be a matter of different focus.

    Cloud security is focused on the infrastructure - looks like you're looking for a security engineer focused on the dev side.

    If they bring neither to the table then I'm with you - but I don't see how "the cloud" is at fault here... especially for security the world as full of "following the script" people long before cloud was a thing.

  • I see two ways forward: either you're risk averse and assume internal damages that will highly influence heat transfer or you trust in the automatic protection mechanisms or your CPU.

    Personally I'd toss it but I'm old and I've burned more than one CPU back in the days with faulty or wrongly installed coolers.

    I don't think that the risk is high nowadays but I'm (literally) burned in that regard.

    I'm not even sure it would survive bending back so perhaps try that first and if it breaks completely you don't even have a decision on your hand :)

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Oh I think I see the misunderstanding, thanks for your answer!

    I had no specific technology or even "social media in my mind at all when writing my first post. Instead I tried to convey my personal preference on the scale "absolute transparency" to "absolute privacy" for the specific case of "seeing who votes in which direction from user about users".

    I completely agree with your statement "don't treat it differently because of underlying tech decisions".

    For me the answer to the privacy question depends on the specific use case (and who provides/ controls it).

    And to answer your question: I only try to describe "my" wishes, not how I think fedi developers see the situation.