Specifically it fucks over CA and benefits states small enough they only get one Representative. Most of the rest aren't too bad.
If we can't expand the House, we could always chop CA into multiple states which also eases the gripes about the Senate some too. And maybe merge the Dakotas and create "Montoming" on the other end.
The idea is that Spain and Portugal are part of the "West", but not Spanish or Portuguese colonial offshoots, which are mostly South American and haven't fared as well as the colonial offshoots from other nations of western Europe.
April 2029, the final time
The end my friends is not near, the hour in fact is quite here
...
It's a Friday 13th of course you won't live, to see noon.
...
Are you paranoid
what's on the asteroid
has got your name tattooed on it?
This stone's called Apophis
And it brings apocalypse.
David Berkowitz. He claimed that in court, and later retracted the statement. Sonny from the Venture Bros parody of the Scooby Gang is also a reference to him.
They care about companies they have less control over and a foreign adversary has more control over invading privacy, for reasons unrelated to seeing privacy as a good in itself.
Because I have no idea and I want some all dressed chips, lol.
Aldi periodically stocks them as an Aldi Find. Probably the closest thing readily available in the US is Zapp's Voodoo - it's not the same, but it scratches the same sort of itch.
I could almost buy that given my feelings about the mental capacity of the poster child for failing upwards, but why would he think specifically Haitian immigrants are lesbians? You know, as opposed to "liberals" or "college girls" (to quote the terrible song from that episode of Bill Nye - did you learn gay in college?) or something...
Trump will likely get away with telling his followers to storm the capitol
Because he didn't. He very carefully didn't. And 1A protections are extremely broad and extremely strong. Pretty much anything short of "You guys, go storm the capitol right now and overturn the election!" is going to be protected speech, and he didn't say that. He carefully avoided saying that, intentionally.
What they'll get him on as far as the attack (if anything) will be if he was involved in planning and staging it on the back end - if for example he was coordinating with people who were directly instrumental in shifting it from a protest at the steps of the capitol to an attack on the capitol in the hours, days, or weeks beforehand. Because his speech was definitely 1A protected.
Yelling “Fire!” in a crowded venue is not protected under Free Speech.
I know that's the famous example, but you're actually wrong. It's only not protected if there's no fire, the person yelling it believes there is no fire, and the person yelling it is doing so to cause a panic or imminent lawless action. Speech protections in the US are extremely broad, and most of the exact lines and contours have been defined in court, often in cases involving the ACLU, the KK, or both (specifically in the form of the ACLU defending the KKK, which is where many of the lines as regards protests were determined).
I would too, unless Congress revokes his Secret Service detail. Secret Service protection is what makes imprisoning him difficult, it's either house arrest or they rededicate an entire prison wing to just him.
I wouldn't let him pick his security and restrict his visitors though. And absolutely no internet or social media. It's supposed to be a punishment, after all.
Because English is a Germanic language that has half of it's vocabulary as borrowed words from a Romance language (French) that then got chewed up and mangled for a few centuries.
Not like Gaelic, which has to own the fact that most of it's words are pronounced in the least sensible way one might think that series of letters is said.
I mean all child mortality stats are shitty, because they're about kids dying.
But the short version of it is that the largest segment of kids dying to guns is them being accidentally shot in the same demographics whose adults make up the largest slice of shooting homicides (in both perps and victims) - minority (especially black) inner city communities.
The reasons are likely related - if you're in a demographic where you're more likely to shoot or be shot you're more likely to have a gun around that's not well secured, which means you're more likely to have accidental shootings too.
To be fair, she probably gets weirdos with variants of "have my babies" more often than you'd think, just not usually from billionaires who own social media companies.
He couldn't talk about his plan, because then someone might look it up in Project 2025 and ask some...unfortunate questions about why all his plans look like that document he once described as a detailed plan for "our movement" but has definitely never read and knows nothing about.
Specifically it fucks over CA and benefits states small enough they only get one Representative. Most of the rest aren't too bad.
If we can't expand the House, we could always chop CA into multiple states which also eases the gripes about the Senate some too. And maybe merge the Dakotas and create "Montoming" on the other end.