Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
0
Comments
856
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • The G.I.F.T. Later referred to in actual research as the online disinhibition effect.

  • To a degree that once a woman chatted me up, gave me her number and I somehow still missed it entirely.

  • You just made me think of a book I once read, written by an AI researcher and author who wanted to try his hand at a format akin to a Japanese light novel. The premise is a girl who is absolutely depraved and terminally online as an isekai. She literally gets summoned while masturbating, gets asked if she is a virgin because the plan relies on giving her holy magic by binding an angel to her and she has to be a virgin for that to work (and thankfully masturbation doesn't count). The angel is bound to her, which gives it access to her mind, and it immediately begins screaming in horror.

  • “To women and billionaires.” Now, that is a telling line to draw. Did you think I pointed out the cultural moment because billionaires are like women

    I'm not implying some sort of general moral equivalency between women and billionaires, but rather merely that both categories routinely get their misdeeds minimized in reporting. The reasons for both are different, with billionaires essentially paying for a white glove treatment while for women it's an effect of the general malagency given them by society. The net effect in how their sexual offenses typically get reported is essentially the same, even if the cause is very different.

    If she were a man, that it was called "rape" would be par the course rather than a refreshing exception. Hell, I looked up this very case on Google and of the top 5 stories on the case, 2 refer to her as "having sex", two refer to a "sex crime" (and in the article describe that crime using "having sex" rather than "rape") and the other was the same Guardian article linked in this Lemmy thread. So, yeah...refreshing exception. May it be the start of a trend.

    Much like I expect her 10 and 7 year maximum sentences will almost certainly add up to less than 5, probably less than 3, with a significant chance she gets a suspended sentence or some probation instead of prison time - as a society we don't like putting women in prison and we like putting them in prison as long as similarly positioned men even less. We won't see that result until April 17, though.

  • In America, where most states the age of consent is 18,

    It isn't. 16 is more common (30 states, if I recall?), with only around a dozen having an age of consent of 18. It seems like more because those states include NY and CA, which are where most of the media in the US comes from. But yeah, most states have close in age exceptions and a couple have marriage as an exception to age of consent. Tugging that thread further, 48 states require you to be 18 to get married without an exception (usually involving court and/or parental consent), one requires you to be 19 and one 21. When you include those exceptions the hard minimum age of marriage in most states is 16 with several higher, with one state where it's 15 and four with no hard minimum at all (including California and Mississippi, Massachusetts was one of these until 2018).

  • Probably more common than anyone thinks, though. Just because of the illicit nature of it, most of them are going to be trying to conceal themselves, and a bunch more are going to sublimate their sexuality however they have to out of fear of punishment. Most of them aren't going to publicly set up and attend NAMBLA meetings, for example.

  • Guardians of Pedos. They aren't all pedos themselves, but they sure as hell work to protect them.

  • I mean in the sense that I have years of experience of one set of things happening, and this is a violation of that trend. It's either unique in terms of the author or the incident in some way that means she doesn't get the softened language typically granted to women and billionaires when they do wrong, or this is the start of a trend. If the latter, I welcome it.

  • Sure, but is the full human brain the minimum set necessary?

    Sentience/sapience is probably an emergent property of a set of neurons needing to coordinate, plan, predict the future and oneself in relation to it.

    I suspect that AI is capable of sentience with sufficient complexity and training, but it's not there yet. I also suspect we'll be well past the point where it is there before we realize it is, but not until we make some kind of fundamental change in how we do it - we know human level intelligence is possible in the volume and power consumption of, well, a brain so we're orders of magnitude off of efficiency limits.

  • ...and likely has better compatibility with more Windows games, which are most games.

    Microsoft has the existing expertise and access to source to build a very effective and basically seamless compatibility layer, akin to how 32-bit apps run on x64 windows using WoW64 (Windows on Windows 64). I guess the real question is if it will be running real windows with an Xbox compatibility layer or a version of the Xbox modified windows with a regular windows compatibility layer.

  • It’s interesting that you concluded with “this must be an exceptionally violent case” and not “culture is shifting enough that explicitly calling these cases ‘rape’ is becoming more acceptable.”

    Cynicism. Well founded cynicism. Though if this is the beginning of a trend and not a one-off I'll be happy to see it.

  • Two charges. Two sentences. Be surprised if she gets even 5 years in actual prison.

  • I mean, it's much more often called "a romp" or "an affair" when it's a female predator and a young male victim. Usually the r word is reserved for female victims. Hell, one of the experts who did a bunch of the foundational work in studying SA in an interview about a decade ago balked at the idea that men could be victims of women at all.

    Epstein's friends get softened language because they're rich and powerful. Women usually get softened language by default. I wonder what made her so awful for this to be reported as a "rape" and not a "romp"?

  • Nothing in the law requires some kind of online server. Only a local API, which a local library that can be linked is. And it only requires age to bebe described in four brackets, hence just storing a value 0-3. Didn't see anything obvious as to why this wouldn't actually meet the requirements, while being as dumb and pointless as possible.

  • Am I missing something or would the following not meet the requirements?

    Add a module that does the following:

    On first account login to an interactive interface, ask for an age category (<=13, 15-15,16-17,18+). So a value between 0 and 3. Store that somewhere alongside user-level application settings. Include a library for applications to link against. Library contains one function, that function just returns whatever value was stored before.

    I think that meets their bare minimum while also demonstrating just how dumb this is.

  • Were they? I've never seen any real evidence to support that.

    Post 8chan Q is very probably Ron Watkins, 4chan era Q is less certain but there are indications it was a South African software developer named Paul Furber.

    Not saying they didn't take their marching orders from Bannin or Epstein, but I'd want evidence of such. And no, the evidence that Epstein played a role in /pol/ existing at all isn't enough on its own.

  • Really? I would have figured the Rapture route would be workable with the right engineering. Especially given the massive amounts of borderline free cooling and non-existing regulatory environment if outside territorial waters.

  • Adding one more person adds more than one comparison. Assuming birthdays are evenly distributed (they aren't), 2 people have a 1/365.25 chance of sharing a birthday. But adding a third person adds 2 more chances. Adding that 23rd person adds 22 more chances than adding the 22nd person. 1+2+3...+22=253 separate checks, of which only one needs to match.

  • People at the heads of nonprofits are often highly compensated, and it's rare that any of them solve the underlying problem or even make meaningful headway. It's why there is so much "awareness" and short term band aids involved. A nonprofit that solves the problem it's supposedly trying to solve has no reason to exist and will cost people well paying jobs managing it.