Devil's advocate: If you saw the things that Hitler did and made others do, and then could be the one to kill him, I think there would be a significant portion of us who would get over human and living being empathy pretty quickly and then take quite a lot of deep, actual joy from ending him.
I realize what you're saying, but it just made me wonder if maybe they aren't so wrong after all. For the record, I've never killed another person, and have never seen another person die in real life, and all real people I've seen killed in video have been truly awful. Yet, I feel like I could take the life of somebody I decidedly thought were irredeemingly bad if needed, and not feel very much remorse. And yet, I don't want to have to ever find out.... But still, there's that age old question: kill or be killed? And I may hesitate. My genetic family has made it this far, I'd like to believe it wasn't full of blissful murderers, but we all know that that's what we all were; it's how we think about, and systemically settle our differences now and into the future that matters. Is reconditioning or even prison truly hubris? I can't believe so. Humans are intelligent and capable of not only change but evolution, we now know that as fact. That I, alone believe in change, yet myself come from a long line of survivors in the age old question of kill or be killed, is evidence of the contrary. Even if the hubris is learned, proves that we are capable of change and hope for better.
Some murderers are gidddy after killing - I would argue that it doesn't mean much. Even assuming they're truly happy, it doesn't define them as absolutely lost. Or maybe evolution states we purify the gene pool. What other things should we purify? Do you see the problem with that sort of fear? Maybe we should all be giddy with happiness to cleanse ourselves of perceived insanity. Or maybe the desire to do so is exactly how that murderer became that way to begin with.
I only live in one state, and don't travel a lot. So I only really know my tiny pocket. But in my tiny pocket, it used to be a somewhat mixed bag, but that job really does attract the worst types and the best types, and the best types can be easily swayed by fear and groupthink. I tend to stay away from cops as much as I can, just because of personality differences, and they're mostly all power-trippy types, it's just the nature of the job, and the longer things go, the more that's affirmed. And control is just had by changing whatever they perceive is the right thing to do.
I'm sure there are humble, normal people out there, but their low visibility through need to conform basically defines the trade alone; most cops really are, or will become, bastards.
Now, whether or not they're really MAGA or not.... You realize, the KKK was/is a community organization, right? Caring about the community is not the issue here, this is a long running cold war of philosophy and world view. And right now, the fascists are overwhelmingly in power, which makes both the loud and the quiet types very much emotionally empowered, and in essence, even louder.
Honestly, if we could just isolate them and put them in a pocket dimension time out for a few generations, they'd mostly kill themselves and each other. I'd be curious how they'd all evolve. Or maybe that's where we all are right now. #sadface
I, too, am distraught to see mildly conservative leaning independent tech branches of society be cancelled in extremely inopportune political times and maybe fall into hands of fascists.
But claiming ig is 100% not a drug is not the way.
Ig is kinda shitty and meta absolutely has fallen into that political trap. "Who's to say how they would behave if we were under left rule, and not far right?"
Tiktok, I'm sad about. It truly was a real haven for many. I didn't use insta, though, I'm too old.
I don't think giving these tech programs into the hands of evil is the right move. But imagine if musk bought meta after a public shaming.
The world is largely headed that way, anyway. And we just have to deal with it. Maga and natsoc is cancer and should be feared and hated and fought as such. In that sense, judging correctly if meta has been infected/is lost/will be lost, is the correct course of action as a preliminary, and further actions stemming from that result. With "this app is addictive and manipulative and influential" being important, but not as.
If we want to win against fascism, unfortunately, they're playing ball and we're standing in the field shitting our pants and trying to smell the flowers.
Does watching it put money in the hands of people doing harm to trans kids? Or will it LEAD to harm to trans kids?
If the answer to either of those is ever yes, then no.
Like does watching Neil Cicigrega's potter puppet pals eventually lead to royalties to jkr? Or does watching it make you eventually want to do anything that will give money to jkr, like watch actual hp content or other jkr content?
These people are all liars, manipulators, rapists, abusers, and murderers. Part of the point of the trial is to find out if it was on purpose or not. And time and time again, magas always express sadness ONLY when punished, and then after, double down on it.
A really big people maglev slingshot on the coast. Like a mile long and safely accelerates them at a 44 degree angle out into the ocean in a little chair.
Edit: okay this one's complicated. It's like saying "holy shit" ("oh my god"), but you're Roman and saying "holy jupiter(the god)", but you're also English and it entered popular usage through Shakespeare, and you're also from before it became "by george"....Or something.... Tldr it's old Latin and jove=jupiter
I never use it, but I'm curious, how is it, itself, racist?
Also, I thought it was race trader like somebody Mexican who sheds their culture and assimilates into white af Beverly hills or something, and therefore has traded one personality/culture for another.
Meanwhile, Valve...