Skip Navigation
  • You agreed to Disneys TOS

    Assassins from Disney licking their fingers because they can legally kill you /j

    Its the dumbest death you can have in an amusement park, dying because the restaurant didnt labeled their allergies right and that the corporation tries to dismiss it because of an DIGITIAL contract that was made for a digital service.

    But this is the bs that you got by applying law so freely.

  • Having nothing and being a "trust me bro, this source is lit and unbiased" is better?

    • source: Trust me bro
  • Having nothing and being a "trust me bro, this source is lit and unbiased" is better?

    • source: Trust me bro
  • But tbh the georestrictions, the trickeling of new series 1 episode per week are stupid.

  • Final the age of linux gaming.

  • YOU can get the service that you already paid for it ad free ( before it got ads in them ) for 9.99$ more than the old deluxe option.

    Its like altering the signed contract you did with them when you subscribed the first time. ( its just how i feel NOT legal advice )

  • We alligned with the mods. Thus we activated it only on certain communities.

    There is sadly required or the "discussion" will end like a bomb hit the comments.

    With a third party they can at least have a reference and wikipedia + ground news

  • you get lemmy silver for it.

  • That if we use their api (for free) we need to have a link to MBFC.

  • Why do we need it removed?

  • But one thing you need to give them is that they give you the option to opt out All in one switch and not switch 9999999 switches.

  • They fight fire with fire i guess.

  • you get the Lemmy.world Silver for making the longest "feedback" as many would say. About how bad MBFC is.

    But still no alternative or improvement ideas. So i guess we will have to stick to MBFC if there is no one with any ideas.

  • I did not remova any comments? Those removed comments are renoved by mods of the community.

    But the issue is there is no other alternative that has an ordered and automatable access.

    Then the other option was to have a community made "source" but that brings up the issue with "User x is not fit to contribute", "Remove the bad rating on site xyz.com" etc. tadah back to the start with the "crying" ablut topic x.

    We are still working on such an system as this could at least reduce the shitstorm about having no option to alter the rating. But its not final that decision.

  • No of course not, some were constructive and gave an alternative site or adjusted format how they expect it to look.