If I had a nickel for every time Clinton's been in the news for a blowjob, I'd have two nickels, which isn't a lot but it's weird that it happened twice
I thought someone who would know had denied it was referring to Clinton; might've been Epstein's brother. The denial could be a lie, but the blowjob could've also been the horse
That's a practically useless question though, and I'm shocked the numbers weren't higher. Of course a ton of people know someone who would never vote for a woman. Who doesn't have a shitbag uncle?
Not just gay; it's the power hierarchy that's the real problem for conservatives here. It would be much less of an issue for Trump if the story was about Bill Clinton blowing him
If we're being pedantic, yeah, but 'source' without qualifiers to me would refer to the one you'd cite. Wikipedia is great for finding general information, and then as you say, finding the source for that information (and also generally a lot more depth to the summary that's on Wiki).
Which is ridiculous, everybody knows that the reason you should be banned from referencing Wikipedia as a source is because an encyclopedia is not a source
Well, you're in the right sub