RedWizard

3

RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them] @hexbear.net 3h ago

This is incredible work. I've been thinking more about what I want to live on abolish.capital and I think resources like these might be one of them.

I have nothing hosted on abolish.capital right now, but I'd love to host these study guides there when I do, with your permission of course!

RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them] @hexbear.net 3h ago

"Oh the further left you'll go"

RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them] @hexbear.net 23h ago

Tragic. Just barbarism all around.

RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them] @hexbear.net 1d ago

Yes but you should read it if you haven't. It's clear they wouldn't be withdrawing if it wasn't for working class organizing.

RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them] @hexbear.net 1d ago

Yes.

RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them] @hexbear.net 2d ago

Just to create maximum hunger

1

RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them] @hexbear.net 2d ago

Don't you see, we're all ultras down here sweaty.

RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them] @hexbear.net 2d ago

Yeah I agree, and they're not out yet but the rest of the article is still a good read.

RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them] @hexbear.net 3d ago

You don't understand you fucking ultra, he's not steering people back into the Democratic Party he's telling you to build a progressive insurgency WITHIN the Democrat Party. It's ENTIRELY different!! /s

2

RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them] @hexbear.net 3d ago

unfairly hostile view of his work

This is defiantly not true. I'm very well aware of his activities in that time frame I watched him nearly weekly. I am a highly critical supporter of his work. One pattern that is clear is that while Hasan dogs on Democrats regularly his only recourse for you the viewer is to put pressure on the Democrats.

This video, which I can't tell if you've watched or not is him explaining his position with the party and his goals with engaging with the party. He's explained this before like in his GQ article. He is self aware that his efforts here are fruitless or are so far fruitless. Yet he makes it very clear that "if there was a 3rd party worth engaging with" he would do that instead. This is a total fallacy however, stuck in this chicken or egg situation where Hasan isn't interested in 3rd parties until just the right one comes along, or until someone else builds it. That's the implication here by his own words.

His advocacy remains untouched by this critique I have. In this space he is by far the leader and the flag bearer for Palestine advocacy. Though the reaction to his advocacy I would have hoped would clue him in to this idea that he's spinning his wheels. Do people like AOC or Sanders or the squad really bring him a platform? Wouldn't he be mostly talking to like minded liberals in those circles? What is the delta between a Sanders supporter and Hasan in terms of their ideas really? Palestine obviously. On all other issues though, roughly the same. Again, I can't say enough about the things I love about Hasan's work. His willingness to put his body out there is heroic. His commitment to interviewing the marginalized and exploited is commendable. His willingness to put his money where his mouth is and fund labor movements, excellent.

His last big push electorally was for Zohran Mamdani. One of the things that he continues to point to regarding Zohran is that his ideas won. Yet he hasn't replaced the billionaire head of police Jessica S. Tisch and likely won't, he's hired a liberal zionist as the Office to Combat Antisemitism, and is endorsing Brad Lander over Alexa Aviles. Now that last point is pragmatic I'll say, but you can't help but look at it and think it must sting for Aviles.

We have to let Zohran cook a little still. But these feel like bad omens. How long until he's been made into origami like the rest? Has anyone asked him about Maduro? And listen, I'll be the first to tell you I was supporting Zohran to win. I would again. The thing is however, these developments are not surprising. Universal Child Care is still a great step forward.

We are still left with the question of what happens with the 100,000 people Zohran mobilized. How many of them did Hasan steer there? This isn't the worst place to start you political life, however, you are now hitched to a Democratic mayor. What I'm saying is that I don't expect Zohran to continue to agitate against the system of capitalism like he once did. That's 100,000 people who didn't get funneled into a working class party that would continue their political education and activities beyond the campaign. Sure, that group formed their own entity in an attempt to try and hold his feet to the fire but, I don't have high hopes for that.

Some gains will be made for NYC but just like sewer socialist before him, the policies of Mamdani will be vulnerable to the next candidate who takes his place. Considering how much Mamdani is shaped by the mayoral role, as opposed to how much HE can shape the mayoral role, its hard to say what his legacy will really be.

This leads me back to my central issue. Why spend our time and energy on a party that is so capable of imposing itself on those who dare enter its ranks? What good does it do if we drip feed in these progressives?

There won't be a working class party worth engaging with if we don't engage with working class parties. The Democrats are not a working class party. You can not reform them into one. They have to much inertia to allow that to happen.

1

RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them] @hexbear.net 3d ago

It sounds like to me you're equating building a working class party with accelerationism. Accelerationism is a term I don't fully agree with as a cohesive framework or ideology. Are the Greens accelerationists in the American context? Are Green voters Accelerationists by extension?

I know that's not what you're saying. It just sounds that way. Accelerationism is the fools gold of ideological perspectives. It ignores the interconnected realities of monopoly capital and imperialism. You can only sharpen the contradictions so far before forces outside your sphere of influence make corrective measures. For example, the Chinese economy can't collapse for the same reason why the American economy can't. They are deeply interconnected. The worst you get is a slow controlled descent, a managed decline. Look at how often Trump dipped the stock market with rhetoric and tariffs only to back off and now effectively "stabilize" with much effort from China and our own capitalists.

So I'm not willing to accept this idea that you engage with the Democrats or you don't and accept your fate as an "accelerationist". The PSL is right there, the run candidates, they're running more this year then I've seen. Why pretend you can move a mountain? When instead you could be helping build one? By his own admission he's been doing this for 12 years. He's seen Sanders betrayed. AOC become the AOCapitulator running cover for Zionists and the rule of law. The Democrats aid a genocide and turn to the right, fail to do anything while aiding fascists in terrorizing and killing people within it's own borders. All this and he still thinks entryism is the right path?

If that's not delusion I guess I don't know what is.

7

RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them] @hexbear.net 3d ago

I don't know that he has ever admitted to being an ML. He quotes Lenin's What Is To Be Done selectively, and I feel deceptively, to support this tactic of entryism which has clearly not born fruit. Democrat support is dropping along side Trump support. It's clear, and has been clear, by his own analysis, for years, that the Dems are not the opposition party. Because of the way the DNC is structured party loyalists and legacy Democrats have outsized power. If there was ever a time to challenge their position now seems like the moment leading into midterms. Not hitching your wagon for another ride, but actually building a working class party. The pressure can't come from within, that's their home turf, they control all the forces in that space. The pressure has to come from outside. They have to be forced to respond to actual political pressure. I don't think he's going to get what he wants out of this. Preserving capitalism is more important then winning elections.

6

RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them] @hexbear.net 3d ago

I mean, he has a Political Science degree. He's clearly well-read. I think his perspective is warped by his proximity to the Democrats, and I think that's intentional on their part. When you look at how often they embrace progressives and then smother them into the fold, dull their teeth, and blunt their edges, while retaining their radical language, it's a clear pattern and tactic they adhere to. The entire western-leftist project is predicated on stifling revolutionary sentiment, building frameworks of critique that are unactionable, or whose actions steer you back into the neoliberal system. The Democrats, to me, appear to be doing exactly that. They are the final dam holding back leftist progress in this country. They are the revolutionary lightning rod, grounding revolutionary sentiment into the earth and preventing it from doing any actual damage. The Democrats need someone like Hasan as an unwitting Shepherd, leading the flock back into the fence. If they stopped allowing him to engage with candidates, what would be left for Hasan to do? If the Democrats purged current and former DSA members from their ranks, and bared future DSA members from their ranks, what would be left for the DSA to do?