Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)R
Posts
0
Comments
20
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Thank you for the response! I'm not sure of the reason for the negative reaction to the question, but I was curious to see whether time had shifted opinion on non-EU arms manufacturers being allowed to benefit from the fund seeing as the prevailing sentiment some months ago seemed to be that it was a good thing that non-EU manufacturers were excluded.

  • How do people feel about this seeing as it may mean less of EU money being spent in the EU?

  • Chortle

  • Genuine question: do the lines diverge (and in which direction / how much) if you account for the number of cars / guns per person?

  • Looks beautiful. Not played one of these for years.

  • Thanks for sharing - will download and add to!

  • That's sort of the point.... no policy or seemingly priority change from the EU despite the enormous geo-political changes.

  • Just to add, the references to Norway and Ukraine were deliberate because they are not in the EU. Also, I don't think the requirement for third countries to commit to defence pacts with the EU is inherently bad, but it should be just that - a defence pact to meet the most pressing threat Europe faces. Making a defence pact conditional on the UK granting access to its fishing waters is moronic.

  • It is just sad to see the same short-sighted pettiness undermining Europe's common interest. I'm not sure your specific points hold any water; obviously nobody anywhere in Europe has voted for this in a general election / referendum, and the current UK governing party (which won a large parliamentary election last year) was for remaining in the EU.

  • It's not being helped if this means that rearmament will be more expensive or inefficient

  • This is utter madness in relation to the UK if the EU keeps insisting on including other crap (e.g. fishing rights) in any third country defence agreement. The UK is as much a part of Europe and has as much of an interest in its defence as Norway and Ukraine, for example.

  • I think you need to take some time away from the internet

  • In practice there is no way non-US intelligence agencies are sharing intelligence that is critical to their agents' safety or national security with the US. I doubt they ever have shared that intelligence with anyone, save in very discrete circumstances. In public they will continue to pretend that they're sharing, as they have always done.

  • Cowards.

  • Great bunch o' lads

  • fuck this

    Jump
  • Fair enough. I think the discussion ends there; I cannot use reason to dissuade you from a position that you clearly did not use reason to get yourself into.

  • fuck this

    Jump
  • So should there be any penalty for lying under oath?

  • Cringe.