It’s just Trump’s typical defense - accuse the other side of what you’re doing before they can, so when they say it, it’s at worst a “both sides” issue to the public.

Always prompt an AI prompter to be prompt in constructing their prompt…to count fingers.

As far as reasons not to vote for him go, there are plenty more important ones. But it seems to be a thing.

It was heavily talked about for as long as the news cycle could bear it, after Kinzinger made a particularly memorable description: like a combination “of armpits, ketchup and butt.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ex-gop-lawmaker-doubles-down-115915282.html

Kathy Griffin said she has experience from The Apprentice and he smells “really bad”: https://www.newsweek.com/cnn-adam-kinzinger-donald-trump-odor-x-twitter-1853353

MSNBC’s Alex Wagner says he smells like “cooking oil.” https://www.newsweek.com/alex-wagner-donald-trump-smells-cooking-oil-late-show-1939625

Yeah, I was amazed by Atlas Shrugged too…when I was 14.

This is what we should’ve spent every waking moment doing since 2016. Why do we distract so easily…

Considering Trump’s track record, it would be strange if he supported something actually likely to succeed.

Say what you want about him, but Needledick has a code.

Sure, when I can, but the issue is I’m in bed for 8 hours and getting 4-5 hours of sleep…

I’m all for people trying, so agree with this.

But my experience: I haven’t had a good night’s sleep in 10 years (wake up and am half-asleep, half-awake most of the night). I went to a sleep study, did the sleep-in-hospital-with-electrodes-everywhere thing, met with three doctors in series after, and their conclusion was that I should sleep more. I wish I was joking.

Oh, so right-wing men with the right genes are the chad and everyone else is the soyjak.

Truly an “interesting observation,” thanks Elon.

This is tragic. I can’t think of how many computers I built using incomparable Anandtech articles. The depth of the testing, and careful, scientific planning really has no match in tech journalism.

The high water mark just lowered.

Musk is taking it to the farm upstate.

Ah, I remember that timeline. The one where things got, what do you call it…better?

Oh, for sure. I’m talking about laws specifically targeted to minors. “Obscenity” is a catch-all that is well-established, but if you are trying to protect children from abuse, it’s a very blunt instrument and not as effective as targeted abuse and trafficking statutes. The statutory schemes used to outlaw virtual CSAM have failed to my knowledge.

For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition

That case was statutorily superseded in part by the PROTECT Act, which attempted to differentiate itself by…relying on an obscenity standard. So it’s a bit illusory that it does anything new.

It’s hard to have a nuanced discussion because the article is so vague. It’s not clear what he’s specifically been charged with (beyond “obscenity,” not a specific child abuse statute?). Because any simulated CSAM laws have been, to my knowledge, all struck down when challenged.

I completely get the “lock them all up and throw away the key” visceral reaction - I feel that too, for sure - but this is a much more difficult question. There are porn actors over 18 who look younger, do the laws outlaw them from work that would be legal for others who just look older? If AI was trained exclusively on those over-18 people, would outputs then not be CSAM even if the images produced features that looked under 18?

I’m at least all for a “fruit of the poisoned tree” theory - if AI model training data sets include actual CSAM then they can and should be made illegal. Deepfaking intentionally real under 18 people is also not black and white (looking again to the harm factor), but also I think it can be justifiably prohibited. I also think distribution of completely fake CSAM can be arguably outlawed (the situation here), since it’s going to be impossible to tell AI from real imagery soon and allowing that would undermine enforcement of vital anti-real-CSAM laws.

The real hard case is producing and retaining fully fake people and without real CSAM in training data, solely locally (possession crimes). That’s really tough. Because not only does it not directly hurt anyone in its creation, there’s a possible benefit in that it diminishes the market for real CSAM (potentially saving unrelated children from the abuse flowing from that demand), and could also divert the impulse of the producer from preying on children around them due to unfulfilled desire.

Could, because I don’t think there’s studies that answers whether those are true.

Yeah, weird - I just posted backup linkies just in case.

Ah, old Bachem Macuno’s timeless screed.

The link seems to not work for me, though, when direct-linked (or, didn’t work on my phone, worked on my computer for some reason). If it doesn’t work, try following the first one: https://worldofvalues.wordpress.com/2006/09/16/bachem-macuno-the-greatest-adult-fanfic-writer-ever/

Second part: https://web.archive.org/web/20220419040328/https://backinanncoultersasssaddleagain.blogspot.com/

I’m recording calls just fine on my Pixel 7 Pro. Any rooted phone can do it free and easily. https://github.com/chenxiaolong/BCR

I just read the article and I don’t know her name.

“Oh, so we can just steal ‘weird’ and turn it against them, like we did ‘fake news’ and ‘fascist’ and all the others, right?”

Followed by:

“Look at these weird liberals who want health care and don’t think of women as cattle!”

#winning, Donald and JD. Never stop never stopping.