Hexbear is where the chapotraphouse users largely have landed assuming they followed the direct line of succession. There probably is some contingent in Lemmy.ml, but not because it was the successor

Make it fast to push the limits of the machine, then bring it back and make it look good afterwards

I would argue that this title implicitly suggests there’s no genocide in Gaza while the other title doesn’t reach beyond the bounds of Gaza.

As to the “wiki is a bad source” I don’t claim to have any knowledge of that poster’s thoughts, but here’s a couple possibilities I’ve come up with:

They thought it was interesting that the genocide was evident to the “ordinary” person that edits wiki despite them thinking it’s typically a bad source

They are just some random ml user whose opinions on wikipedia don’t strictly match that of the concensus of lemmygrad, hexbear, et. al. Since those instances are more united on that stance than I’ve observed Lemmy.ml to be (right or wrong as they may be, not making a judgment here)

Because she’s not trans

All keyless start kias and hyundais are/were immune to the Kia boys trick

MAUs is a decent measure, but last I know (admittedly old data) Hexbear had quite the outsized post/comment rate for their users compared to other instances. I don’t know if the higher MAU count on the other instances counterbalance that at this point, but I think that’s at least worth something in determining the size of their presence on the fediverse

I wouldn’t call hexbear faded in the slightest. You may have them hidden/blocked/whatever to that effect

Ml is run by the creators of Lemmy, and hexbear is well… Not. Hexbear made their own fork of lemmy a long time ago and only in the past year or so have they been actually able to federate at all. I don’t see the creators of Lemmy going through all that effort to hide their identities if they were actually running hexbear behind the scenes

Not OC, but wasn’t Argentina on a fun ride of inflation before the current government anyways? The core idea is sound still if that’s the case, though slightly misplacing the blame

Only reasonable explanation I can come up with is that I installed it before this requirement was made and my install is grandfathered in

Without a nightly or dev version I’m running bypass paywalls clean from github, persistently on the latest Firefox desktop release. I do not believe it’s signed by Mozilla, but I could be wrong

On mobile that may be the case, but on desktop you can definitely install extensions not signed by Mozilla

I would advise against the water soluble wrapper pods since they’re iirc a major contributor to microplastics in our water

From Tumblr, I’d bet?

Ah you’re right, I just read what I thought was there probably because of the subtext op gave. It was just a university lab in Indiana. The only connection then is that some of the people that worked on it are (assuming here) Chinese

I think your title is misleading. It was a joint effort between a DOE lab and a university lab Chinese lab.

That aside nothing to me really seems to indicate a relationship between the tin catalysts for this and the euv droplets beyond they’re both tin, and small. For euv, they need to be propelled through the air (and liquid? [might be done by the laser, idr]), but this technology it sounds like they’re solids on a substrate.

Being able to make tin particles a controlled size that small may help euv, but I think it’s a bit of a spurious connection.

Manifest v3 is about add-ons or extensions like ad blockers, grease monkey, etc. Manifest v3 gets rid of some features of Manifest v2 that will severely hamper ad blocking. Mozilla has committed to keeping manifest v2 support in addition to v3 as a bypass to this

I saw an article somewhere on lemmy recently that had some commentary from an American tear-down r&d type shop that said they think BYD makes a small profit on them

I did read it before I posted, thank you. In the same article it cited speculation it didn’t revoke the original for fear it would cause more diehard originalists to splinter and form their own more dangerous group(s), not that I endorse that reasoning, just that there are reasons not to revoke outside of it being a sham PR move.

You mean to tell me that an attack on Isreal largely had Jewish deaths? I’m shocked!! While the stats VS demographics can’t feasibly disprove the angle you’re aiming at, I similarly think it definitely doesn’t prove it either.

If you mean the supernova rave, here’s an article from an Israeli newspaper suggesting Hamas wouldn’t have known the rave was still ongoing and later says, “According to a police source, the investigation also shows that an IDF combat helicopter that arrived to the scene and fired at terrorists there apparently also hit some festival participants” which really muddies the waters about who is responsible for what.

The hostages, that by the large majority of accounts (that I’ve seen, so sure some bias there) have been treated as well as their guards? Or do you mean the ones that got shot by the IDF, or the ones that got blown up by the IDF?

I don’t mean to suggest that Hamas is some perfect beyond reproach organization, but from the actions I have seen of late, they’re largely just fighting against the state forcing them into these conditions.

Like they did in 2017? Wiki link English full text