• 12 Posts
  • 880 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle
  • And who do you trust to cut down the red tape? The conservatives that promised to cut red tape through brexit? Only to increase it many-fold after they were confronted with the reality everyone warned them about, that completely divorcing from the EU single marketwould be ruinous for the UK, so they were forced to put in place a bunch of half-measures to still keep access to the EU.

    And what red tape are we talking about? There must be a list of unecessary red tape. I’d like to see a public debate around what rules to cut, rather than trusting the next conservative promising to just get rid of all the bureaucracy.



  • a bit of nuclear is kind of necessary to help round out less consistent energy sources a

    I really don’t get how this argument still flies after all these years. From an economical perspective, nuclear is the worst type of energy generation you can pair renewables with. Putting the still unsolved nuclear waste debate aside for the moment, building nuclear plants is massively expensive and takes a lot of time, which is the exact opposite of what would complement renewables: Cheaply built capacity whose stand-by cost must be as low as possible.

    Nuclear reactors need subsidies throughout its lifetime to compete with renewables on price and they need to run constantly.

    Renewables already push the energy price into the negatives during peak production, so what you really need is batteries that can smooth out energy prices over a day or bridge a day with bad energy production, as well as energy generation that is cheap to build and keep in reserve, like gas plants that can burn a hydrogen mix.

    When it comes to the economics, all nuclear power plants do is drive up the price set by renewables. England may have need for some nuclear power plants to keep up their stockpile of nuclear weapons, but when it comes to energy generation, hydrogen-burning powerplants will fit the need of renewable energy production much better in tge future.












  • I can’t speak to “all” the china coverage, but China congratulating Russia for their elections is being reported now, because the elections were now. As for negative coverage, there are also good news coming from China, like them being able to super-scale renewable energy production, the sales figures for EVs or the general fact that China is good in lifting people out of poverty. That shouldn’t overshadow the fact however that China is a one-party autocracy without free elections and the most oppressive surveillance state, which is committing a cultural genocide against minority peoples within their borders.


  • Sorry, but you have lost the plot. Your example is Fox News stirring up anti-immigrant sentiment by prominently featuring one immigrant criminial, wanting to cast all immigrants in a bad light. The article the OP posted cites a spokesman of China’s foreign ministry as saying

    “China congratulates Russia on the smooth conclusion of the Russian State Duma elections,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun told reporters in Beijing.

    Your example tries to put blame on a group of people by highlighting one individual, the article cites an envoy of a state making an announcement on behalf of the state. If you can’t tell the difference between the two, you need to check yourself.



  • Genau das wäre eine Vergesellschaftung: Ein Tabubruch. Nicht nur, weil Artikel 15 GG noch nie angewendet wurde, sondern auch weil CDU und Springer-Schergen jetzt so ausrasten um den deutschen Volk berechtigte Empörung vorzugaukeln.

    Und genau das brauchen wir: diesen Tabubruch! Die AfD bricht andauernd Tabus, wenn sie von millionenfacher Abschiebung redet oder alles Anderssein verteufelt. Die CDU bricht die Rechtsstaatlichkeit mit den illegalen Grenzkontrollen, das sollte eigentlich auch ein Tabu sein.

    Immer wird von “Ein ‘Weiter So’ darf es nicht geben!” geredet, wenn die Gewinne der AfD thematisiert werden. Der Tabubruch der Vergesellschaftlichung wäre genau so ein Bruch mit dem “Weiter So”. Schon allein das politische Signal, dass solch ein Tabubruch senden würde, durch das Land und durch die westliche Welt, ist die Umsetzung der Vergesellschaftlichung wert.

    Ich bin bis jetzt Grünen Wähler gewesen. Wenn die Grünen jetzt kneifen, war es das mit meiner Unterstützung für die.

    Ganz nebenbei ist der Titel Schwachsinn. Keiner behauptet, dass die Vergesellschaftlichung allein die Wohnungsnot löst. Wieder dumme Polemik, um Klicks zu generieren.