Right I conceded this point elsewhere. That being said I did have a period where I was a whole foods zealot and it was very hard to reach protein goals even eating meat. I was on a bulk so I was basically eating every 2 hours, but the worst thing was how much cooking was involved.

I now supplement because of that but I can still reach 130gs or so of protein some days on whole foods only. But I don’t know that I could do that with a vegan only diet without supplements. Which why I highlighted how difficult it is.

Linux is not an OS.

Was thinking in the context of body building when I wrote that.

For me the most bizarre thing with Trump is his obsession with windmills. It was fine if he brought it up once or twice but it feels like every time he opens his mouth he has to mention windmills. Maybe he was molested by a windmill or something?

I was going to retort but it is a fair point. I have reached more than 100g on whole foods but on most days I do rely on supplementation. Especially during a cut.

FYI just in case I have nothing against vegan bodybuilding or vegans in general. Mad respect for people who actually manage to successfully do it as I can’t imagine it being easy. I actually use vegan protein myself because it’s cheaper (tastes terrible though).

How many would you need to eat to reach 120g of protein though? Like 6 or 7 cups? Again I’m not saying it’s impossible just very very hard.

Not impossible but damn near without resorting to hyper processed foods. Rinos can digest fibrous foods in ways humans can’t

I hate these fucking articles. That’s how it works with every new tech/industry etc. Everyone spends billions and billions hoping it becomes profitable 10-20 years from now, maybe it does maybe it doesn’t, we can’t know but that’s how this shit has always and will always work for basically every new tech or research that happens.

Maybe complain about countries not taxing corporations enough, but not how new industries and technologies are funded.

deleted by creator

In school when I realized that the people who copied homework and cheated in exams could get the same grades as me with a quarter of the effort + everyone else gave you shit if you told on them and the teacher still didn’t change their grade because you have no proof.

If someone commits suicide because of online words from a stranger then they were not mentally well in the first place, and maybe shouldn’t be online at all but rather getting help. Doxxing is not quite free speech? It’s an action taken against an individual. Free speech for example doesn’t grant people the ability to accuse you of crimes Willy nilly, if they do so they are liable for defamation.

But that’s neither here nor there, platforms as private spaces have a right to limit free speech as much as they want. I don’t think it’s good for society when they use that power too strictly, and the fact that they did for about a decade I think it’s one of the main causes of the rise of the alt right, but it’s a right the platforms have. Just like you can kick someone out of your house for saying something you don’t like. When one says free speech what is meant is that someone in a public space can say whatever they want, be it hateful or not.

Free speech must include all speech including the hateful one simply because “hateful” can be manipulated to mean anything.

Pro-Palestine is an example that was given already. But others might also say that being pro abortion is hateful speech. You might disagree but whoever is in the power is the one that gets to define what hateful means. And that’s why free speech must shelter hateful speech as well.

Hasn’t Britain always been like this? Are people generally upset about this or just a vocal online minority? I mean I would never support something like this but if the people support it well, it’s their will.

I want her to exploit my means of production so bad, if you know what I mean.

Ooooh we got a badass over here

The left in general is experiencing an absurd Luddite phase that started exactly around the last election when all the techbros revealed themselves as supporting Trump. Tribal epistemology is the term I think?

Now every test that is conducted needs to be meticulously planned and calibrated as to not even lift a speck of dust or else it’s causing irreparable damage to the environment, taking everyone’s jobs, and destroying everything.

It’s ridiculous. I don’t like to say that TDS is real but sometimes it really looks real.

I don’t think they’ve ever actually done anything? Terrorism, legally, has a very precise definition. If you simply start calling orgs terrorists because they are adversarial, you set the precedent for legal political persecution at levels that not even Trump and co dares to do. Put simply, it goes against the very founding principles.

I know that’s the rational thing to think, but the reality is that they often don’t leave anyways. Look at Europe, they have billionaires too and they don’t leave despite being taxed higher than Us billionaires. Also a further reality is that the billionaires are not really citizens of any nation, they are highly mobile and probably spend time evenly in various countries. They already have their money well spread out.

I deleted my message because I realized you were talking about oligarchs not Nazis. It is still illogical though. The French Revolution happened already.

“We learn from history that we do not learn from history” - Hegel

deleted by creator