Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)O
Posts
6
Comments
273
Joined
4 yr. ago

  • Is there any other kind of lib?

  • Every fucking time I hear that line this turns out to be the result, without fail.

  • This is a great way to deflect legitimate blame from the Democratic party representatives and operatives who actually deserve it, as if it isn't their goddamn job to listen to voters.

  • I'd say it's another form of the Desmond Tutu quote: “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”

    Sitting at the table with Nazis and not killing or reeducating (forcibly if necessary) them implies tolerance of their intolerable views, which is thus functionally acceptance of their views.

  • That seems apt. Democrat complicity in the Gaza genocide was the last straw for a lot of people, and arguably why Kamala lost. Importantly as well, I suspect Dems will not be trusted again by a large group of the population unless significant changes are made or the party is "Theseus-ed" into a completely new format, if they survive as a party at all. And that segment of the population grows every day as awareness of the genocide spreads and is discussed.

  • Always a good practice

  • I think anyone who engages in, advocates, or aids a genocide, particularly based on a perceived sense of racial superiority over the victimized group, qualifies sufficiently as a Nazi.

  • Based on a brief tour through their (corsicanguppy) comment history I'm guessing BlueMAGA at least, which translates to "I'm a Nazi but I don't like being called a Nazi". Here's an excerpt from one of their recent comments:

    Voting isn't some bargain between a thousand voting groups and one candidate. Let's break it down.

    THERE ARE TWO CANDIDATES

    YOU PICK THE BEST CANDIDATE

    [...]

    The unmentioned third option is "If you vote third party or don't vote at all, you accept the consequences of a worst-case scenario".

  • Talk about Streisand effect. I've never heard of you before but your "about" page and this comment look rather fun and enjoyable.

  • "China's stealing organs!"

    "Oh shit, someone will take my gock for free?"

  • Lmao how will Reddit ever recover from this? Hint: They won't

  • What is freedom to the starving man who can't afford bread?

  • It is nice when the good guys win

  • apt

    Somebody called the Debian users?

  • Yeah, because things are going great as they are, right?

  • Yes, yes they are. Actually the Republicans at least have the virtue of being honest about being evil. Dems are too craven to even admit that.

  • but as it stands, most voters are currently voting out of fear of "the other big party"

    Which is a confidence game. The big parties only matter because people have been convinced that they matter. Once this illusion is broken, real progress can begin, but until it is broken the US will simply continue its vicious cycle into oblivion.

    Besides, what chance to Dems have of winning at this rate anyway? What chance did they have leading up to this past election as they covered up Biden's dementia, enabled a genocide, and imposed a candidate of their choosing after denying the people actual democracy? Are they redeemable?

  • That's what the Greens and PSL elected to do. They're the best way out that doesn't involve bloodshed.

  • No, they just stepped aside and profited from donations while it happened