

I got a folding Silky saw for christmas. That thing cuts almost like a chainsaw.
A contrarian isn’t one who always objects - that’s a confirmist of a different sort. A contrarian reasons independently, from the ground up, and resists pressure to conform.
I got a folding Silky saw for christmas. That thing cuts almost like a chainsaw.
Something like a Tapcon would seem more suitable for the job
I don’t see how even the way Twitter does it is any worse than not having such system at all.
Is the answer that their parents paid for all of it as is the case for most people under 18?
Very few organizations stand on shakier moral ground when it comes to accusing others of war crimes.
This is such an idiotic thing to generalize to every “rich” person. You can do better.
People used to talk about slaves in exactly the same way.
Our AI assistants might not be conscious yet, but there’s a good chance they will be someday. Treating them with basic decency from the start just seems like the right thing to do. The way I talk to ChatGPT isn’t all that different from how I talk to people - and I don’t feel the need to switch modes just because I’ve rationalized that something isn’t deserving of respect.
I’ve gotten this only a handful of times and simply refreshing my VPN has solved it every time.
It’s the current trendy thing to say. Kind of like the term “executive dysfunction”
If it’s notifications you’re after you can try saying positive things about capitalism or Elon Musk for example or simply go into a thread where everyone is outraged about anything and try making some sense in there.
I don’t get why these don’t just get treated for what they are: motorbikes
Hot glue comes off with heat.
Well if it turns out that he in-fact didn’t kill Brian, then I’m more than willing to admit I was wrong. I just wouldn’t hold my breath on that one.
All the evidence points that way. Feel free to explain why you think I’m wrong.
He murdered a person he thought deserved to die. Isn’t that what death penalty is?
I think this is great. One of the main reasons I’ve been paying for the subscription is the limited memory of the free version. Now, the more I use it, the more it remembers about me and references things I’ve mentioned in past conversations. Sure, there are potential privacy concerns, but the same goes for commenting on Lemmy - I don’t tell ChatGPT anything I wouldn’t be comfortable sharing here.
If you saw it in half and leave the sawed-off surfces on the outside nobody will be able to notice that they’re slightly narrower.
EDIT: Nvm, read your other comment.
He’s clearly pro-death penalty himself so quite hypocritical of him to now all of a sudden be against it.
Well AGI would solve climate change in a hearbeat but nobody knows wether it’ll take 5 or 500 years to get there or what other consequences comes with it. Personally I tend to think that we don’t solve it by cutting emissions but rather with technology wether that be carbon capture or not. This is something AI at least has the potential to help us with.
Why? You want people you disagree with to stay silent?