Says it in the article:

The discovery of the missing data from the budget airline’s Boeing 737-800 jet’s crucial final minutes was surprising and suggests all power, including backup, may have been cut, which is rare.

And this is why it is too cheap to call these people idiots. They know exactly how to get the image they need and spin it to their advantage. AND they move faster than their lies.

This image is really calming, great stuff!

The apostrophe is feet, right? That’s shallower than I thought.

You put the “L” in “LLM”.

(/s if needed - I absolutely thrive on extensive word jamborees)

Out of curiosity, do you know how deep your bore ended up being?

For a year? Still seems cheap!

IMO people are less likely to reject AI in some use cases, taking over medial tasks (e.g. email drafting, writing cover letters)

BUT it is the sneaky and persistent way in which many “AI assistants” are forced on users with no option to opt out. We all know it’s just to open out huge data gathering services and increase revenue, not for our benefit.

All about that export baby!

It’s a Swiss cheese model of risk management.

Alone, each layer (slice) of the security system has holes. But, when you put more layers on top (each with their own holes) some of the holes are now covered. Add more layers, and cover more holes.

In an airport, it is not just TSA but also cameras doing pattern recognition in the airport for suspicious activity, add into the mix complex national security measures and you would hope there is sufficient layers/coverage to stop most serious cases.

Beautiful! Maybe refrain from posting that name in German communities though…

I’m going to assume this comment is satire and not engage further than this.

Sure, nuclear energy is valid and all, but you sound like an absolute spanner…

If you want to argue that nuclear energy has its place, maybe don’t ridicule people who remember how much of an issue the last major nuclear meltdown was (and partially is).

Once a luxury is present for long enough, it becomes normal. You cannot be angry at masses of people for wanting to enjoy their life.

Your points are not invalid, it’s not sustainable and likely won’t be for some time, but many things are a luxury only available to a few in the present (e.g. MRI scans, 50" TVs, car capable of going +100km/h, 3+ electronic devices per person). No one is ready to give up their luxuries, especially when others still have more.

Schnell meine Verständnis zusammengefasst: Alle in China wollen E-Autos. VW machen ein Großteil deren Umsatz in China. Jetzt wird den Gewinn wahrscheinlich in den kommendenn Jahren immer weniger, weil die schlechten E-Autos produzieren.

(Falls Sprachfehler euch nerven: deutsch ist nicht meine Muttersprache und ich bin zu faul jetzt alles oben zu prüfen <3)

[ref]

It was a marketing piece and it did its job incredibly well. Few people in the world don’t recognise it on sight (unfortunately).

Lemuroid is superior

Insurance should cover everyone for everything and should remain affordable for all.

I’m lost in the air travel debate and it sucks. Ignoring the strike and pilots specific concerns, IMHO:

• Emissions of flights are horrendous and will be viewed as barbaric in 30+ years. It needs to stop.
• Denying those of a lower income the opportunity to partake in air travel is also horrendous, and should not be the main mechanism to disrupt the industry.
• There are, in many cases, no alternatives to air travel, so it cannot be abolished.

Smarter regulation is needed, but the finite details will likely never suit a majority of people.

Global energy demand is not expected to fall, especially as more people gain access through economic development of traditionally poorer nations.

That is why increasing renewable generation capacity is so important now.