This is why i don't buy the conspiracy that he is still alive. I can't imagine what the powers that be would have to gain by letting him live. He's much too dangerous.
You shouldn't need a discriminatory law to allow it. Your resume speaks for itself. It might feel good to do something like this, but it's flawed from the start and we shouldn't start down that path.
Not to be that guy, but I can't see this ever holding up or getting approved in the first place. As of now there is no way to discriminate based on previous occupation. The only legal grounds for job discrimination currently in California is based on being a sexual predator or violent felon. Even regular felons are allowed to be teachers. Not sure it's a good idea to go down the path of allowing job discrimination based on what your previous job was, particularly when it's a completely legal occupation.
Indeed. Completely understandable to establish borders to keep certain people out who might mean you harm or who might disrupt the peace of your community. Unfortunately you also need infrastructure to enforce those borders, such as documentation and an enforcement agency. But it's worth it in order to keep your community safe.
It's actually not even about the vaccine, but the fact that people were about to lose their jobs over it, and for what? The science didn't support it, but zealots like you pushed it, wanted the blood of the heretics standing up to the official narratives that didn't logically make sense. And now you downplay it while exaggerating and distorting narratives about murder in the streets.
No, I'm bothered that we couldn't talk about natural immunity, something that was understood and taken for granted for hundreds of years prior to covid. We couldn't talk about the origins of the virus, and we couldn't talk about who was actually at risk and how we could respond to address that. I'm bothered that people like you thought it was ok to force people to get vaccinated or effectively be removed from society regardless of the actual risk/ benefit associated with it. People like you got the vaccine and then when it didn't work as well as we were told it would, started to find scape goats. Thankfully the supreme court finally stepped in, otherwise who knows what big pharma could have done to society. And you would have been perfectly fine with it. Talk about fascism, how about when pharmaceutical companies collaborate with the government to force people to take their product, otherwise they cannot participate in society? Hypocrite. No moral or intellectual integrity, only justification and mental gymnastics to support your team. People like you make me sick, and lemmy is full of them.
I remember calls from the left to round up unvaccinated "plague rats", having to present proof of vaccination to eat at restaurants, and eventually a vaccine mandate. A federal law requiring covid vaccination for the right to have a job. A new class of illegal person was created during covid.
Safe spaces are a micro border, a way for people to separate themselves from other people for their mental health. Should they be allowed to do so and does that have any relevance to the larger discussion about borders? I think it does. I think people instinctively want borders to protect themselves from others who might mean them harm. It's natural and inherent to humans. Just curious what you thought, given your stated stance on borders.
Yes, but none of the protesters were affiliated with the church or had any stake in the church at all.