Like deliver 100 tonnes to the moons surface in a single ship?
What do you think they're failing at so badly compared to 60 years ago.
Supreme Court nullifies Liberal MP's election win by a single vote in Montreal-area riding
Alberta justices speak up about independence after premier muses about directing the courts
Top White House official selling Arlington home after activists write chalk messages on sidewalk | ARLnow.com
Canada Clears Tesla in iZEV Rebate Investigation, $43M Payment Unfrozen
Alberta bans school library books it deems sexually explicit
Ontario set to begin construction of Canada's 1st mini nuclear power plant
CyberTruck Gets 5 Star Safety rating from NHSTA
Volkswagen to halt US ID.4 production following 100K vehicle recall
Ford CEO Jim Farley discusses the rapid evolution of electric vehicles
Porsche recalls all Taycan models globally for brake fix
2024 Tesla Model 3 AWD Qualifies for $7500 USD EV Credit again.
Thoughts on range extenders for commuter cars?
VW to adopt NACS
Tesla Manufacturing: See how the cybertruck HFS panels are blanked, bent and built
Well, if my google search is right, they've already done 15 crewed flights (there/back so 30) with the longest duration in the capsule being over 3 days, and there are people on the ISS, so whatever it is, isn't needed for any of that manned spaceflight which makes me think its just something that allows for an extended trip, and having a bigger ship, opens the possibilities of other solutions.
For example, they can just take a less complicated but larger CO2 scrubber and/or more oxygen instead of having to use a super complicated one with a material we maybe can't re-create due to space/weight constraints. They'll have 100 tonnes to work with. 1 tonne of oxygen would last a small crew for years. Also that 100 tonnes
mightprobably be after life support systems if they're talking about delivering 100t to surface.I'm tired as well, I'm going to head off to bed.