You share the same political beliefs as PJ and he actively seeks an echo chamber. Why would he ban someone likely to agree with him or upvote his content? Even if you don’t directly engage with him you might comment favorably on someone else’s posts even and he can get his fix. Almost all of his energy is driven to political content is why this matters.
That’s not an insult to you, at least not from me.
This is due to one reporter using Google Translate with his source and the other DeepL
In my state at least millions in federal funding goes towards projects. Day to day operations are funded by state tax dollars and they still want people to pay ever increasing prices for public transport.
Honytawks argument further falls flat when you consider tax dollars do go to public transport.
Edit:clarified state tax vs federal
Actually on the side of law enforcement here, accuser has to provide burden of proof. It’s pretty hard to prove how stupid and ignorant someone is or is not. Edit: It would make defense by ignorance the default plea and abused horrendously.
Only thing I think law enforcement gets wrong is THEY are allowed to take the defense of being ignorant of the laws they are supposed to be protecting. If anything a cop wrongfully charging someone with an offense and then admitting they didn’t know what they were talking about should result in a larger punishment for them, not less.
My question is, Are they brave enough to do the airport scene from MW2?
You say valid but they tried to share a vice article. I think the ban was justified but the mod had to give a believable reason /s
I love that every single person who doesn’t like a behavior on here says that behavior is “destroying the fediverse”