Nono, this is the Fiio Snowsky Echo Mini - a tiny cheap mp3 player with a retro style. I have one, it’s around 60$-70$

Both

That’s your problem. All you want to do is argue and resort to ad hominem. Accusing me of lying when I didn’t lie about anything is puzzling, but I gotta admit gave me a chuckle. The only point I made is that letting bad actors have the whole cake just because they touched it is gonna leave you without cake. While people argue and bicker over who should or shouldn’t the cake been given to - the cake was already appropriated and eaten. It’s a pattern that repeats and gives more fuel to the opposition. You love to disect analogies, pick at words, and sea-lion to no end instead of doing something useful or putting that effort where it matters. You let emotions prevail over reason and deploy scorched earth policy. And instead of actually engaging in constructive discussion you vague post something without proper context formed by weeks of actual community discussion, and when you’re called out on your bullshit you pretend to take some sort of high ground, resorting to childish language, calling me a liar. If you wanna put your words where your mouth is - abolish all modern electronics, because the coinventor of the transistor was a racist and firm eugenics believer.

I didn’t say anything about supporting them. The hysteria is unwarranted

https://frame.work/gb/en/blog/framework-sponsorships show me the sponsorship.

The rabid techno-elitism and boycotting of anything that is in the same air space as some bad actors is completely counter-productive and paradoxically invites more bad actors to invade and take control. To bring up the old nazi bar analogy - you don’t leave the bar to the nazis, you kick them out. But instead what is happening is completely bass-ackwards - perfectly capable tools are being left to the bad actors and giving them a platform to take over.

Don’t leave the tools - instead embrace them, wield them against those who would happily do that against you. Build a strong userbase and drive nuts out until the bad actors have no power and no control. You think we just left the enigma machine to the nazis and said “ew”? You think the resistance just left MP40s on the ground and didn’t wield them against their oppressors? That’s no path to survival.

In a time when the world is burning up and drowning in waste, Framework actually is doing something good for sustainability and repairability; but instead of focusing on dozens of actual sponsorships that contribute to actual good, some people rabidly focus on the one asshole and try to change the narrative and erase any goodwill. Omarchy isn’t even listed on the sponsorship list - AFAIK FW sent him one machine and that’s it. We don’t have the luxury to turn our nose and go somewhere else - this is our bar, fight for it and stop encouraging good patrons from leaving. Because the silence left behind will be happily filled with nazi rhetoric.

Please don’t spread misinformation with no context.

You just made an assumption on how the research was done, that’s your strawman. Then you attacked me and assumed something completely not true, that’s ad hominem. You’ll be hard pressed to find someone who hates Artificial Idiots more than me, but I also hate bad faith arguments that reduce any person to a handful of stereotypes or a caricature. Instead of throwing insults try engaging in constructive dialogue.

Well that’s a nice big strawman you got there. Lotta assumptions

There’s dozens of us! DOZENS!

deleted by creator

I think what’s implied here is the types of feeds which give a completely new content page when you “refresh”, so it’s not a regular “refresh-as-in-show-me-content-that-got-posted-since-last-access”, but an algorithm driven “refresh-as-in-replace” mechanism to increase engagement by continuing to provide stimulating content.

There was another one in Battlefield 1 - an experimental machine gun with two magazines, but only one could be engaged at a time. You would pull one out slightly and push the other one in. The idea was to be able to switch between two different types of ammo for increased versatility (e. g. regular ammo against infantry and incendiary for anti-air). As with most weapons featured in Battlefield 1, I think this was a prototype that never saw any real action.

:る

Looking at the “damage” - it seems whoever removed them used a hard scraper and some sort of aggressive solvent. This is not damage from the googly eyes, but from the hands of the remover, who probably had too much caffeine and enthusiasm that day.

Something something corellation, causation

Is it a Tesla?

They are transcoding them into the video. Sponsorblock had to make a quick change to discard submissions from users that have been identified to be on this trial system, because it affects the video length, and as such - makes it impossible to have consistent segments