

Why wouldn’t they? They have it on hand and it would obviously yield “better” results for their intended use case.
If you’re going as far as trying to generate AI csam you’re probably quite deep in that hole already, why settle for less?
Why wouldn’t they? They have it on hand and it would obviously yield “better” results for their intended use case.
If you’re going as far as trying to generate AI csam you’re probably quite deep in that hole already, why settle for less?
In the Netherlands it’s, no joke, 15 minutes and ~60 bucks.
Did it before, as a foreigner too, easiest shit in the world.
They even have dual language forms.
That is called a “No true Scotsman” fallacy.
It is a feminist action because a large swathe of South Korean feminists openly adopted it as a shibboleth, whether it is consistent with the principles of your preferred brand of feminism is irrelevant.
It’d be the same as saying protesting in front of abortion clinics in the US isn’t Christian (except Christianity has explicit rules so the comparison isn’t 1:1) when most if not all protesters would cite their religion as their motivation.
Yesn’t.
Gaben said stuff to the effect “of steam were to shut down we would take steps to allow your library to stay offline forever” but that is nowhere in the tos and also doesn’t really mean much for the fear that steam will stay and progressively enshittify.
The word consumer is so demeaning…
I doubt they were trying to be complimentary.
Wasn’t one of the Witcher 3 expansions already either nominated or even a winner a few years back?
How the hell do you accidentally remove fog of war from a strategy game?
That is moronic to a level I didn’t expect from this, I can see why he left the negative review.
Kind of a stupid decision to call something pre-currency and pre-codified laws “anarcho communist”.
It’d be like calling something born before animal life “vegan” because it doesn’t eat animals.
Technically correct, maybe, but very much missing the point of the label.
they’re just screwing us out of possible remakes
Bro don’t make me like them T~T
Ayyy I know that reference. Good story that one.
Removed by mod
The people who made the casting choice were told by Disney they couldn’t cast either, it was that or get replaced by someone else who would play ball.
It’s ridiculous to expect them to remove themselves from a multimillion dollar project that would get done anyway with or without them.
Eh, they weren’t happy about it but were caught between a rock and a hard place, I can sympathise.
The only one of these that is remotely acceptable, to me, is Tilda Swindon, because they explicitly detached themselves from the character to avoid getting shat on by the CCP for casting a Tibetan and from Americans for casting a Chinese person.
The others are all crap, IMO.
Every time a character is <color>washed we lose the chance to be exposed to global actors that would fit their profile.
Because it’s pressvertising.
Veilguard has had a year (at least) of relentless, shameless astroturfing, ever since BG3 got GOTY, because EA knows it’s not gonna be even close to competing with it and they (rightly) fear Veilguard will get shat on, especially since Bioware is on a 2 games abject failure streak with Andromeda and Anthem both failing horribly and Inquisition having at best a mixed reception with how buggy and repetitive it was at launch.
As a rule of thumb: if an article comes out before a game’s actual release, it’s positive about an aspect the game or franchise is known to be lacking in, and it sounds like John Oliver’s parody of a corporate shill? It’s pressvertising.
It’s access-for-coverage, a trading of favours that stays undisclosed because technically no money changed hands; however, in the past we’ve seen what happens to outlets that don’t kiss the ring and use the access to actually speak negatively of the product, or even neutrally, so we know there is an implicit (and explicit if you know the history of these dealings) pressure to be positive at any cost.
So in short: it’s a bad article pretending to analyse the content they have early access to when really they’re just advertising the game uncritically. It’s literally just source-washed marketing material.
Here’s to a multi-year long process to port the campaigns from BG1 and 2 into 3.
I mean, would you? It looks like the most generic checklist driven product I’ve seen yet.
It’s so spineless it may be more lobster than game.
If anyone’s got a code they’re not using I’d happily take it off their hands 😇
Henry and Hans are going on a lads holiday. Awesome.
Nice try, FBI