Maybe more transparency would be good in the Nobel Peace Prize process. One thing is clear to everyone except maybe one person though: Trump definitely does not deserve it.
Its not like its easy for the people to stop. Person À and Person B are both involved in a scuffle. Cop or whatever tells them to stop. If A stops but B doesn't stop, A just gets his ass kicked as a best case, or might get killed as a worst case if B has a weapon, for example. And vice versa. They have to both stop at the same time, which means expecting coordination between them which is ridiculous.
There's also the very real possibility that the homeowner did stop and freeze, but person B kept attacking, and so the cop still shot at them since they didn't both stop.
It's ridiculous that this needs explaining to a supposedly trained cop.
It baffles me that it is even possible to summarily strip citizenship like that.
Like, it would be a lot more reasonable if people born on US soil, only in the future, no longer get citizenship.
But how can it be legal to remove citizenship by redefining the law, and then retroactively stripping people of it that no longer fit the definition? Like, isn't this the same as making a law in 2026 banning smoking, and then going back and jailing anyone who has ever smoked?
She, and all the department figureheads, are experts at making us waste our time. Bondi is really not worth it to listen to - complete waste of time. But she spouts bullshit that's obvious bullshit but takes quite a bit of explaining to show why it's bullshit. That slows the resistance down.
If it can exacerbate psychotic tendencies, then it can cause psychosis. Claiming that increasing or exacerbating tendencies doesn't necessarily mean it is causing it, is an interesting area for debate, but it's just semantics. Of course, I am also arguing semantics here.
I think ehat is more interesting psychologically to ask is just how much does AI exacerbate psychotic tendencies, or if AI-induced psychosis is temporary (like drug-induced psychosis often is), or is permanent. I dont know anything about this topic but I hope to hear from someone who does.
It looks like the person with his hands up was trying to help the cop that fell off his bike. The second it looks like he is touching that cop some other cops start attacking him mercilessly and without much thought. The bike cop seems to be putting himself in that situation and being violent with protesters for no clear reason.
Yeah probably, but I think consumer hacks slash microchip companies might buy them and retrofit them to be GPU's. If most of them are not just sold to the public, I suspect that nVIDIA et al might buy them back from business customers, and then modify them to re-sell to consumers.
Maybe more transparency would be good in the Nobel Peace Prize process. One thing is clear to everyone except maybe one person though: Trump definitely does not deserve it.