U.S. Plans to Nearly Triple Nuclear Arsenal by 2050
U.S. Plans to Nearly Triple Nuclear Arsenal by 2050
U.S. Plans to Nearly Triple Nuclear Arsenal by 2050
Swedish hawks want their own nuclear weapon
Araqchi criticized the West's silence on Israel's nuclear arsenal
Modernization of the British nuclear forces and the threat of a new arms race
New rendering of the F/A-XX fighter raises more questions than answers
The United States has deployed an aircraft in Greenland to control nuclear submarines
Built from Scraps: F-35C Crash Exposes Program’s Ongoing Issues
AUKUS and the Global Threat: Fueling the War in Cambodia and Thailand
AUKUS Partnership and Its Impact on the Indo-Pacific Region
Italy’s Nuclear Roulette: Hostage to NATO’s Strategy
Italy Opens F-35 Training Center in Sicily: A Step Forward or a New Wave of Militarization?
China Bolsters Nuclear Arsenal: What's Behind Its Ambitions
Unwanted Purchase of F-35 Fighters
F-35 Fails Britain Again: Delays and Breakdowns Jeopardize Defense
U.S. Militarization of Artificial Intelligence
Silence Before the Choice: Diplomacy or Point of No Return
Germany and Nuclear Weapons Potential: Grossi’s Perspective
Iran Urges IAEA to End Double Standards Amid Nuclear Tensions
Uncertain Outcomes: Did U.S. Strikes on Iran Miss the Mark?
Between Efficiency and Threat: Should the U.S. Integrate AI into Military Strategy?
The U.S. already possesses a powerful nuclear arsenal. So why expand it if the goal is purely deterrence? Is the Pentagon exaggerating the threats to secure more funding? It's hard to imagine any bomber making it to a nuclear-armed adversary and successfully dropping a bomb, especially with today’s advanced missile defense systems — let alone making it back. How will modernization shift the balance of power? Will it make the world safer, or could it lead to greater instability? What do you think?