I'm confused. I thought the hostile takeover was supposed to work by appealing to the shareholders directly, presumably through some mechanism that allows a vote. If it just went back to the same board that had rejected their previous offers and accepted the deal from Netflix, how was this "hostile takeover" any different from a normal bid?
- Posts
- 3
- Comments
- 577
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- Posts
- 3
- Comments
- 577
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
They already demolished it, so a temporary restraining order wouldn't fix that. Anything they start to build can be destroyed later, so that wouldn't be irreparable.