Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
13
Comments
90
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Get out of here with your non-manichean views!

  • I never thought about that. I like it!

  • Didn't know sealioning was even a thing until now... This may explain a few interactions I had on Lemmy, I'm also very susceptible to that stuff

  • Thanks for this, I missed their comments before deletion.

    Good on you for your thinking capacity as well, that seems to be getting kinda rare...Let's hope and assume it's a "empty vessels make the most noise" type of situation.

  • Yes! Thank you!!!

  • It was really more some kind of oscilloscope that needed to be programmed then it played the whole animation.I have never heard of that before or after seeing that video and I think it's a bit of an obscure technology.

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    What is this old vfx tech called ?

  • Real

    Jump
  • I'll try that! Does it work well for you?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I agree this is all about semantics, you seem to consider nature only for its bad sides (but don't forget we also get all our food from nature).

    Nature is really terrible, actually. It's an endless cycle of violence, death

    Dying sucks but I don't think we should ever stop doing that (at a reasonable age, let's be clear).

    I agree that being above the violent killing part of nature should be an ideal, but I'm sorry to say I don't believe we're there yet, people are still killing; for food, for fun, for greed, just look at the news... :'(

    I resent this "man is part of nature" argument because at face value it romanticizes suffering.

    Here you raise an important question: does being part of nature exclude us from using technology?

    I don't believe so. To me being part of nature does not mean to live like our ancestors did when there was no manmade things, or when you would get burned at the stake for doing science...(I'm not sure in what periods of history you would consider we were part of nature).

    The way I see it, we could be part of nature while using a lot of the technologies we use today. We would just need to tweak (a lot) of them and drop the use of many more, but I'm convinced that, if everybody started taking their responsibilities, we could find effective ways to produce enough medicine and food without the damage that those currently cause.

    So yeah, I get you, you get me, we just don't mean the same thing when we say nature :)

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Thanks for a well thought, well written answer!

    I guess I missed the point of the comic a bit...

    I think you're right, they either expressed themselves wrong or misinterpreted the panel.

    So, for this I guess there was whoosh! My bad.

    I should've thought some more before replying to you.I saw someone defending ecology under a post that could be seen as ridiculing it so my brain went all white knight towards what seemed to me like a pedant dick... But turns out I was the dick.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • The point the comic is trying to make is that things were not better in the past, right?

    That's a pretty broad take that is obviously full of holes.

    Pretty sure no whoosh happened here and the person you're replying to was just pointing at one of those holes.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Saying we're above nature sounds like we're better than it/better without it (which some people seem to think but please, let's not give that idea more traction by declaring it a fact).

    I think it's more like humans are trying to separate themselves from nature.

  • So did you! Pretty sure you're right about the artist being a dude for the reason you mentioned.Thanks for giving my point a thought.

  • I agree with the sentiment but "Absolutely no woman has ever fantasized" about that?

    Do you really believe that? If not, why use these words? I don't think it serves your purpose and it's too bad.

    Don't hate me please. I'm just talking semantics which are important to me

  • Openings and indentations aren't the same thing though, are they?

  • Where I live there are few unused radio frequencies.And if you drive for 20 minutes to another region you'll find that whatever frequency you were on is being used...I doubt that's a problem in the USA though.

  • Genshin Impact @lemmy.world

    Reward code giveaway

  • Thanks :)

  • Good idea ^^ I may take it that way

  • Thanks!

  • I Made This @lemmy.zip

    Butterfly Butter Knife

  • Done! Will post about it later with more pics but here's a sneak peek :)

  • I Made This @lemmy.zip

    Folding butter knife

  • What is this thing? @lemmy.world

    Whose are these?

  • What is this thing? @lemmy.world

    What are these devices?

  • I Made This (MOVED TO LEMMY.ZIP) @lemm.ee

    Little weapons

  • I Made This (MOVED TO LEMMY.ZIP) @lemm.ee

    Work in progress - Bluetooth speakers

  • I Made This (MOVED TO LEMMY.ZIP) @lemm.ee

    I made this yeast keychain

  • I Made This (MOVED TO LEMMY.ZIP) @lemm.ee

    I made an audio cable tester

  • I Made This (MOVED TO LEMMY.ZIP) @lemm.ee

    Carbs scoop

  • I Made This (MOVED TO LEMMY.ZIP) @lemm.ee

    Playing cards pouch

  • Pareidolia @sh.itjust.works

    Pine person